Originally Posted by
cactiboss
Is that language legal? That language is what our attorneys reference as proof of collusion to unsrp the wests rights. When did the west give up a claim to the Nic?
Again, wouldn't that have been a question to answer before recommending to your clients to vote for it? Did they only learn of this after the vote less than two weeks ago? Remember, you guys voted for it and as a block would have had a really good chance of defeating it.
I thought you guys had an aversion to changing things after the fact. You say we agreed to the Nicolau process, and we did by union consent. You guys agreed to this with your vote. Going back afterwards screaming collusion would be a stretch.