We can now safely assume that the only way the cockpit would be accessed by hijackers is through the crew opening door. The policy is not to open the door, and since it is written so it shall be. No crewmember will open the cockpit door for a hijacker. The FFDO can only use his firearm in the case of a breach of the cockpit. Since the cockpit cannot be breached and since no crewmember will open the cockpit door for a hijacker, there is no need for a firearm.
The cockpit most certainly can be breached, and no, the only way is NOT by opening the door. Not in the least.
Within your last two posts, you stated that "
The FFDO program is a waste of taxpayer money," and then went on to say "
Just as we would still buy locks for our valuables, we should continue to fund the FFDO program. They are both inexpensive and cost effective."
On the one hand you assert that the program is a waste of money, but on the other you say that it's cost effective, inexpensive, and that we should continue to fund the program. Do you bother to read what you write, or hear what you say?
Lastly, can you please quote the post made by JNB were he stated the cockpit would come under attack by bears?
I've addressed it repeatedly within the last 13 pages of this thread. You appear to have trouble understanding what you write, let alone what anyone else writes, but if you're able, perhaps you can look it up yourself.