Originally Posted by
USMCFLYR
Well...you certainly seemed to have copped an attitude at a simple question.
You also seem to be one of those that thinks that 99.9% of the FAA is the FSDO.
This is disappointing.
I know that you have been around long enough to appreciate the complexity of the entire NAS and based on following your posts for quite some time now I figured that you were smarter than that
Regulatory agencies are hardly anyone's favorite entities, and ALL gov't agencies have their fair share of problems with the FAA's having plenty that I see even at my lowly worker level; but that comment about the "work" level shows a serious lack of real knowledge of the myriad of "work" level afforded the NAS to provide the services that keep this aviation system up and operating safely.
No coping an attitude, sorry if it came across that way.
I think you know of me better than that.
Anyway....as for the FAA, I'm sure there is way more to the multi-level complexity than what my feeble mind understands.
The interaction I've had with ATC Sups and FSDO guys lately has been "less than stellar" to put it lightly. Now that doesn't mean all Feds are bad. The FAA is a government agency and there isn't a government agency that isn't over spending and over staffed.
Any who's......no attitude! Sorry.
