Originally Posted by
inline five
I totally agree.
It's definitely the smart play to vote NO, lose $1.8 bil in pay, and still not get min day.
Yep, only a dumbass would vote YES to make an additional $1.8 bil under the same circumstance.
We can always trade the $1/hr in compensation to get min day later on, and still be $15-$30/hr higher than we would be by voting no, not getting calendar day.
Did you no voters take math in college?
Here is a simple calculator for you. Tally it up.
22 on the BOD agree we should all be paid for every day we are on the company leash.
$4,000,000,000.00 is the profit last year.
$7,000,000,000.00 is the profit this year.
$1B was the proffit he projected.
$1,900,000,000.00 is the new projected fuel savings.
.........
$30-$50 million is the cost of the single item we have asked for.
The BOD offered an immediate close on the deal for a measly $50M, yet Parker said no. He gave the FAs twice that and they didn't even ask or give anything in return.
For just $50M spread out over 6 years Parker could have been a hero for making just one improvement, but he had to snub his nose and magnify his s!httty labor attitude.
Who is the dmuba$$??