Old 05-22-2015, 08:23 AM
  #289  
Andy
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,153
Default

Originally Posted by Typhoonpilot View Post
They really don't, and in fact have curtailed if not eliminated it entirely. So ALPA's attack on EXIM, if successful, could result in the loss of tens of thousands of U.S. jobs with no material affect on the airlines in question. Typical brilliant ALPA strategy.


Typhoonpilot
OK, now you're engaging in over exaggerations. Many of those purchases would occur with or without EXIM financing.

Originally Posted by Typhoonpilot View Post
For the UAE I believe it was $1.2 billion between Etihad and Emirates, the rest was other.

Did you not see that Atlas Air, a U.S. company, had $864 million in there?


Typhoonpilot
I did. You understand that they aren't supposed to be eligible for EXIM loans/guarantees because they're a US company, right?

But I oppose the UAE receiving any EXIM money; they are not who the program was set up for. And I'm sure you know that.
Andy is offline