View Single Post
Old 07-04-2015 | 07:07 AM
  #20  
SawF16
Mother’s finest
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 311
Likes: 8
From: 220A
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
This ta is worse than c2012. If we say no we are better off. If the next TA is worse,we are still better off with c2012. Why should we be in a hurry and give up basic work rules to go down to the UAL rules that they hate?
Not taking a position on the TA one way or another, but just to clarify here-

You were adamantly against C2012 when it was a TA up for a vote. So JCBA>C2012>TA2015.

Would you still say you prefer the JCBA to C2012 after how C2012 has turned out pretty much exactly as the "sell job" advertised?

*minus hiring being later than most expected

Last edited by SawF16; 07-04-2015 at 07:09 AM. Reason: Dickson memo
Reply