Sounds like some attacks are on for a yes vote, which is OK I guess.

I view Mikes and Anitas positions are that, although there are some gains, there are also some losses. Along with the usual unknowns due to lawyerly language.

So, you can look at the whole and say forget it, the package stinks overall. Or you can say that yea, some areas are lacking and others are OK.

Weigh the TA and vote based on what you think you are worth and what you are being offered.

My personal opinion is if Behnke were to read some of the stuff on here he would be crying.