Originally Posted by
JamesBond
Well for starters, we won't be 'fixing' our alleged deficient scope clause wrt international JVs. Once the camel is in the tent he's in. But, oh yeah... we are gonna just say no until they fix these things, right? Do you have any idea how laughable that is? We get further behind in pay AND watch the likelihood of full retro evaporate. (Standing by for 'you are all about YOUR pay rates' bullshiite) There are others I am sure but those are the most obvious.
SCOPE is your example? We will most likely do more damage with new scope provisions. Improvements are what we want, right? Retro = 3B4 and higher PS, even a few on your side of the argument acknowledged this will likely happen with the absence of an amendment to the PWA.