Originally Posted by
skypine27
Dear god.
I didn't make it through the whole video. I like Pat as a person but he's not a confident public speaker so it's kinda painful to watch.
So I missed the part where we "want" to work an extra 5 years for full retirement !???
Well, it wasn't actually specific. And I don't have the stamina to sit through the video again to verify. Just new ideas mentioned, in the same breath as UPS and 30 years, leaving me thinking, "What exactly are we talking about, here?" Maybe someone else who was more awake while viewing can verify this.
I was initially all for talking about this, thinking, what can it hurt to talk about it? We don't vote yes on anything unless it's a win for the entire group. However, I tend to agree with Lag's statement, "If CBA 2006 is any indication it depends on how many members of the MEC and the NC plan on staying more than 25."