Preposterous how? I stated the facts as I know them, disagreed with some, but didn't attack nor call names because they disagreed with me. I agreed with your assessment of the situation, but not your dialogue with MX.
Without us, they wouldn't have a job. But without them, neither would we. Credit to those who do.
I think it's silly to have LCAs telling us to do stuff because "this is how we are teaching it now" without a reference. On the topic of switch position, I don't think it will hurt the acft to leave it in, because I understand the system and the logic very well. But unless it is written somewhere, it is just technique in my book. Put it in a memo for all to read, and it becomes policy. Incorporate it into a change in the manuals on the next rev. It's that simple.
Originally Posted by
JesuitValen
I think your read on past pages, while not unique, is preposterous.