Originally Posted by
rickair7777
Instead of lottery for the final cut, how about oldest first?
Age or experience could be used to rank otherwise equal selection results. But HR would not like that, since it is best to hire young when faced with a long term labor shortage. Which could lead to my conspiracy theory about why "too much time" is an issue these days, but I will spare everyone
that rant.
As for the issue at hand, I think that a lottery would make many in the industry face up to their deeply held just-world fallacies.