Originally Posted by
Jetjok
How about we do the same thing in reverse, in other words, when a geezer is flying with a still-wet-behind-the-ears guy, the geezer gets paid a premium for having to teach, monitor more closely, provide insights into where to eat, where to drink, etc, etc.
Your reply was really insightful.
Q: Who monitored you when you were a "still-wet-behind-the-ears guy"?
A: Some under age 60 guy that's who.
For future reference if you keep it all about age you have a leg to stand on. As soon as you branch out to ANYTHING else your case falls apart. The primary motivation for repealing age 60 was NOT due to it being unfair (and I agree that it is age discrimination). It was, to quote Jerry MacGuire in reference to "SHOW ME THE MONEY".