Thread: Prostate Cancer
View Single Post
Old 07-04-2019, 12:06 PM
  #5  
Excargodog
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,501
Default

Originally Posted by ApachePhil View Post
I am leery of surgery since there are several treatments with comparable outcomes that have significantly reduced side effects.
From current American Academy of Urology recommendations:

Clinicians should not add androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to radiotherapy for low-risk localized prostate cancer, except to reduce the size of the prostate for brachytherapy. (Strong Recommendation; Evidence Level: Grade B)

Clinicians should inform low-risk prostate cancer patients considering whole gland cryosurgery that consequent side effects are considerable and survival benefit has not been shown in comparison with active surveillance. (Conditional Recommendation; Evidence Level: Grade C)

Clinicians should inform low-risk prostate cancer patients who are considering focal therapy or high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) that these interventions are not standard care options because comparative outcome evidence is lacking. (Expert Opinion)

Clinicians should inform patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer who are considering focal therapy or HIFU that these interventions are not standard care options because comparative outcome evidence is lacking. (Expert Opinion)

Clinicians should consider staging unfavorable intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer with cross-sectional imaging (CT or MRI) and bone scan. (Expert Opinion)

Clinicians should recommend radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy plus ADT as standard treatment options for patients with intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer. (Strong Recommendation; Evidence Level: Grade A)

Clinicians should inform patients that favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer can be treated with radiation alone, but that the evidence basis is less robust than for combining radiotherapy with ADT. (Moderate Recommendation; Evidence Level: Grade B)

Clinicians should inform patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer who are considering focal therapy or HIFU that these interventions are not standard care options because comparative outcome evidence is lacking. (Expert Opinion)

Last edited by Excargodog; 07-04-2019 at 12:39 PM.
Excargodog is offline