What you're saying is "should Boeing be considered at fault if they designed an aircraft that tries to crash itself if one sensor is taken out by a seagull?"
Think about that.
Based on your post history it sounds like you're trying to make any imaginable argument that exonerates Boeing. But the argument you've just made is exactly the opposite. Airliners strike birds all the time. It's a known hazard of aviation. The idea that an airliner that could go into "I'm going to kill myself and everyone on board if you don't do something RIGHT NOW" from losing one data sensor due to a birdstrike is absurd. If that is indeed what happened it fully justifies the 737 Max grounding.