Originally Posted by
trvsmrtn
Normally I would say that he is correct, but seeing the way this administration has no regard for the constitution or laws in general, then yes, he would be incorrect.
He is correct, the military leadership would refuse such an order. Every senior officer is fairly well versed on the legalities and we have lawyers to remind/advise us.
You could deploy federal forces anywhere, and the mere presence of armed military units would likely provide a stabilizing affect. Such forces could self-defend, and also defend other US persons who are observed to be under attack. But they can't bother people out walking their dog (the National Guard can though, when under state control).