Old 08-13-2020, 03:22 PM
  #18  
rickair7777
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,186
Default

Originally Posted by Grumpyaviator View Post
What is the potential liability if employers require a vaccine that turns out to have unknown side effects because it wasn’t tested thoroughly?
Probably no precedent for liability since there's probably never been an employer who required an non-certified vaccine.

If an employer requires a certified vaccine, then the certification is on the mfg and FDA. You can sue anybody for anything but, but you're probably only going to have a shot at the mfg. Even the FDA is probably untouchable.

There's no indication whatsoever that the US, any western nation, or even China is going to skip any of the normal testing so there won't be any basis for "wasn’t tested thoroughly". If a vaccine were to be approved without all normal testing complete (looks highly unlikely at this point), it would under be emergency authority and would be labeled as such.

Last edited by rickair7777; 08-13-2020 at 05:53 PM.
rickair7777 is offline