Old 08-13-2020, 03:29 PM
  #19  
Excargodog
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,501
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Probably no precedent for liability since there's probably never been an employer who required an non-certified vaccine.

If an employer requires a certified vaccine, then the certification is on the mfg and FDA. You can sue anybody for anything but, but you're probably only going to have a shot at the mfg. Even the FDA is probably untouchable.

There's no indication whatsoever that the US, any western nation, or even China is going to skip any of the normal testing so there won't be any basis for "wasn’t tested thoroughly". If a vaccine were to be approved without all normal testing complete (looks highly unlikely at this point), it would under be emergency authority and would be labeled as such.

Actually, the US assumed liability for vaccines years ago. It was the only way manufacturers would keep making them after that Bogus - and - never-to-be-sufficiently-damned Lancet article linking immunizations with autism.

https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compens...out/index.html

Last edited by rickair7777; 08-13-2020 at 05:54 PM. Reason: Correct Typo
Excargodog is online now