Originally Posted by
JohnBurke
That poorly formed opinion was an emergency revocation that cost six hundred thousand in legal fees, and a lot more in terms of reputation, loss of availability, certification, and other damages.
Hoover's case had no evidence, either. Far from substantial, or a preponderance. Light on substance. Heavy on bull****.
Weaponized regulation, abuse of power. Typical.
Agreed, my post didn't come across with the right tone. I wasn't trying to minimize Mr. Hoover's plight whatsoever but did try to (unsuccessfully) indicate that it was an over zealous ASI that instigated the whole debacle without a shred of evidence.
Thanks for the tune up JB.