Originally Posted by BluePAX

Because NoWork, Stan, jackal etc can't dispute those points. They are regurgitating ALPA's stance, which appears logical and sound on the surface, but did not foresee certain possibilities like the ones TonyC points out. I appreciate TonyC for his deep dive into the realistic scope issues we could face if this TA is voted in.

​​​​​The company does not have our best interest at heart. They are beholden to the shareholders, and if a situation could benefit them they will explore it. It's business.

Likewise, we should shore up any holes in our scope, it's business. Opening it up was a mistake that may or may not have grave consequences. I can't vote yes on something that has such a chance to negativity impact my family's life someday.

But even if scope were unchanged, the "industry leading pay rates", signing bonus, and QOL give backs in a non concessionary environment are insulting.




​​​