Originally Posted by
jcaplins
Sorry, I should have clarified that my post was not directed at you (the OP).
I will also add there is no new "revelation". Scientist bicker about details of a particular topic all the time.
(and why is no one talking about the criminals hacking into private e-mail accounts?)
Fair enough.
Your point about scientists bickering is essential. The CRU, and many other establishment climate research institutions, produce conclusions that support their theories. They refuse to provide (to the bickerers) the raw data or the processes that led to their conclusions. If the math and science are bulletproof, put it out there and we will buy it.
Your other point about the hacking (or inside job) is well made, but beside the point. Does the fact that this data was obtained illegally affect whether or not it is true?
WW