View Single Post
Old 05-04-2010, 10:47 PM
  #85  
charles9
New Hire
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 5
Default New math?

Originally Posted by thor2j View Post
Your turn to read again. Furloughs have no active status and therefore will go to the BOTTOM. Sorry, but proven over and over. Career expectations as well as longevity(NOT DOH) have weight. CAL has 10x more career expectations. I am trying to be neutral by saying the only fair way is relative seniority. I would personally like the career expectations heavily weighted, but figure the only way we will ever come to an agreement is straight relative seniority. Don't forget most 2005 CAL hires have more longevity (aka active time) then most UAL furloughs.

Thor,

I am a UAL furloughee, about a third from the top, I know I'll get hosed. It is a career expectation. However, good sir, I know for fact I have more time on property at UAL than a 2005 CAL hire--even after 7 months on furlough. Not that it really matters to you...

Enjoy your career...fellow professional.

CC
charles9 is offline