Originally Posted by
xjsaab
Dual quality allows us to better compete with skywest and others. It does no good to punch the nose to spite the face. A no furlough clause would be great. I'm sure the union has drawn up comparables for staffing.
So you want to help the company out by allowing for dual qual? Then on the other hand you want a no furlough clause? Aren't these two opinions contradictory? I'll be a NO vote for anything with a dual qualification unless we make huge gains in all other areas (which is dubious at best). Let's do away with all healthcare options except for the HRA plan like Skywest to help us better compete, are you for that also? They have it, why shouldn't we?