Old 12-10-2005, 11:31 AM
  #38  
KiloAlpha
Gets Weekends Off
 
KiloAlpha's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: AA A320
Posts: 1,624
Default

You're a tool, we were not talking about the weight of my aircraft. We were discussing when an aircraft is required to have a SIC, and part of the requirements is based on weight (large aircraft).

My plane MTOW 10100. Ramp 10160. Landing 9700.

Also, in response to someone's post that SIC requirement has nothing to do with weight,
here is a FAR quote:

91.531: Second In Command Requirements
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no person may operate the following airplanes without a pilot who is designated as second in command of that airplane:
(1)A large airplane, except that a person may operate an airplane certificated under SFAR 41 without a pilot who is designated as second in command if that airplane is certificated for operation with one pilot.

Last time I checked an aircraft deemed "large" had some type of weight associated with it.. yep it does 12.5... so apparently, mr. smarty pants, weight is a factor!

Last edited by KiloAlpha; 12-10-2005 at 12:00 PM.
KiloAlpha is offline