Originally Posted by
FDXLAG
Tell me where my history timeline is wrong:
The company and the union quickly agree on several modification to a new TA but decide that work rules have to wait for 2 years because no one will be able to figure out until Aug 2013 how rules announced in Aug 2011 will impact us.
The Mec decides that 3% is enough to buy enough yes votes to essentially pass a FDA LOA and some other cost neutral changes. So they weakly endorse the TA.
The MEC and the NC decide that maybe a hard sell is required after all.
Now is there anything in this timeline that is wrong or misleading? ....whats my agenda?
The TA is only for 1 year with an option for a second year. Where are you getting this no one will be able to figure out until Aug 2013 stuff from?
Where are you getting that the MEC decided that 3% was enough to buy votes? That's a pretty strong accusation.
So, only the APC guys can try a hard sell?
Your agenda seems to be to skew the facts to convince people to vote the way you want them to.