N2264J is a shill for the greenies, he tries to make sense, but he can offer not a single practical solution, or a single forecast come true, or even define what part man may play in warming.

It is easy enough to criticize big oil, coal and nuclear-but the fact remains there are no viable options at this time.

The best solution to the "warming" problem right now would be to defund the UN and move their headquarters to Libya.

I don't think any scientist has stated that man is the SOLE cause of any climate change. If they do, they have just ignored the entire history of the Earth and its numerous cycles of warming and cooling along with higher and lower levels of CO2. All of this happened before man was on the scene and they will happen long after he is gone.

They only real questions are what part is caused by man, and are there any practical solutions. To ignore the very real natural cycles and causes is pure propoganda.

Lots of scientists think we could build a better human race through eugenics, and they may be right but few of us could stand the practical implications of such a policy. It is thus with most "solutions" posed for climate change, the "solutions" would necessarily pare the world population in a rather brutal manner-all with no real promise of success within a thousand years.

There are indeed a lot of cranks out there, and the easiest way to spot them is in the practicality of their approach to problems and the way they define a problem.