Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Air Wisconsin
Questions for Current AW Pilots >

Questions for Current AW Pilots

Search
Notices
Air Wisconsin Regional Airline

Questions for Current AW Pilots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-20-2017, 11:17 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 237
Default

Originally Posted by schmohawk View Post
I'd rather be in the air but the sits aren't bad knowing that we are at least getting paid thanks to the 2:1 duty rig
Bull****

We need to negotiate for better duty rigs to get rid of these inefficient lines and 3 hour sits.

Half of my days this month are hitting duty rig.

As it stands, if you're hitting duty rig on your trips, you're working for half-pay.

This wouldn't be a problem if lines were efficient like they were a couple years ago, but now you can't go anywhere without long sits.

Pay raises would be great in the next TA, but if we got better rigs you could be at home more often thanks to more commutable lines, or you would be paid appropriately for the work you put in.

Last edited by Grumbletrousers; 06-20-2017 at 11:28 AM.
Grumbletrousers is offline  
Old 06-20-2017, 02:55 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WhistlePig's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Ending the Backlog one claim at a time
Posts: 486
Default

Originally Posted by Grumbletrousers View Post
Bull****

We need to negotiate for better duty rigs to get rid of these inefficient lines and 3 hour sits.

Half of my days this month are hitting duty rig.

As it stands, if you're hitting duty rig on your trips, you're working for half-pay.

This wouldn't be a problem if lines were efficient like they were a couple years ago, but now you can't go anywhere without long sits.

Pay raises would be great in the next TA, but if we got better rigs you could be at home more often thanks to more commutable lines, or you would be paid appropriately for the work you put in.
This......
WhistlePig is offline  
Old 06-20-2017, 06:28 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
schmohawk's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Position: CRJ 0B
Posts: 215
Default

True those things are better , I should have said the sits are better getting paid than not; not optimal. The company is will build the lines they want. Better than not getting paid for your airport appreciation time ..... I guess the grass is always greener

Last edited by schmohawk; 06-20-2017 at 07:02 PM.
schmohawk is offline  
Old 06-20-2017, 07:48 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 101
Default

Originally Posted by schmohawk View Post
I'd rather be in the air but the sits aren't bad knowing that we are at least getting paid thanks to the 2:1 duty rig
That helps for sure!
lukeh99 is offline  
Old 06-22-2017, 05:06 PM
  #15  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 17
Default

Originally Posted by CaptureThis View Post
You said 121 time, with a E145 SIC type rating. Umm I am pretty sure if you were flying part 121 you can not have an SIC type rating and be legal, correct me if I am wrong, flying part 135 yes. Not to mention a 50 seat airplane can't be operated under 135 unless it only has 30 seats in it. I was just recently hired also with two SIC type ratings flying part 135. I was not eligible for the 8k because SIC type ratings do not count, (PIC only) the rest of the bonus is still pretty sweeeeet though......
Originally Posted by CaptureThis View Post
You said 121 time, with a E145 SIC type rating. Umm I am pretty sure if you were flying part 121 you can not have an SIC type rating and be legal, correct me if I am wrong, flying part 135 yes. Not to mention a 50 seat airplane can't be operated under 135 unless it only has 30 seats in it. I was just recently hired also with two SIC type ratings flying part 135. I was not eligible for the 8k because SIC type ratings do not count, (PIC only) the rest of the bonus is still pretty sweeeeet though......
You can fly 121 as an FO with out a type rating domestically but not in international airspace i.e. iCAO regions.

The SIC type is a bull **** worthless use of ink on paper.
A SIC type came about as away for the FAA to satifisy ICAO Reg's several years ago 2005 to be exact. To prove that FO's where trained.
This was only nesscary on international flights where ICAO Reg's were in place.
Example a Falcon 2000 crew the Captain with a "real type rating" DA2000 and a First Officer with training only and no endorsement indicating type specific training on her/his pilot certificate could fly the DA2000 anywhere in the world with no issues. FO did not require a Type rating. Some time in 2004 ICAO said only crews with type specific training could operate in international airspace.
The FAA had no provisions for this so they created the Bull **** Type and called it the SIC type. It was a band aid to allow operators to continue to fly in International Air space. That is why the SIC type exist.
It has nothing to do with CFR 49. 121. Operations. A 121 air carrier operating domestically does not require the FO to be typed.
I know because I flew B727's,F27's,Convair 580's DC-9's as a FO with out a typerating.
I will say that the real leagacy air carriers for years have checked and issued type rating to FO's because the training and checking are the same. The Bull **** Scumbag regionals and commuter airlines would not issue a Type because they were afraid you would use it to go to another operator. The regionals now use the Full/ real type as a dangling carrot to lure you to come to them even if they operate domestically.
This is why Air Wis only pays 8k for a real Type on the sign on bonus.
And I back them up on this.
The SIC is worthless

https://www.federalregister.gov/docu...ot-type-rating
Graybird is offline  
Old 06-23-2017, 12:56 PM
  #16  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 18
Default

Yes I am aware of the SIC type for ICAO reasons under 135 I used to go international and was aware of the rule. It is a absolute BS rating however I do not think it makes you any less of a pilot compared to the PIC type rating in the same type aircraft. It may be a littler easier check ride, also a solid way for a company to save money on training and to see if your worth spending the money on a type rating. I just did not know the same rules applied in the 121 world. Everyday you learn something new.
CaptureThis is offline  
Old 06-23-2017, 01:05 PM
  #17  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 17
Default

Originally Posted by CaptureThis View Post
Yes I am aware of the SIC type for ICAO reasons under 135 I used to go international and was aware of the rule. It is a absolute BS rating however I do not think it makes you any less of a pilot compared to the PIC type rating in the same type aircraft. It may be a littler easier check ride, also a solid way for a company to save money on training and to see if your worth spending the money on a type rating. I just did not know the same rules applied in the 121 world. Everyday you learn something new.
As a former Examiner for the ATP and the Type rating on Jets the check ride depending on the operators ops specs are pretty much the same.
I agree the company should type an FO as the cost are minimal.
The only reason they don't is to use the type check as a carrot to get the FO to stick around, if they did Type the FO the FO may leave the company for so called greener pastures.
Graybird is offline  
Old 08-13-2017, 06:30 PM
  #18  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2017
Posts: 42
Default

I have an interview coming up with Air Wisconsin, I have a few questions for any AWAC pilots on property:

Is it possible to group blocks of days off longer than 3 days if I volunteer for reserve or junior manning during the rest of the month? I will be commuting from the Southwest for a while and longer stretches off preceded or followed by longer stretches working is more feasible for me. Any info on this is greatly appreciated.
newto121 is offline  
Old 08-13-2017, 07:49 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 841
Default

Originally Posted by newto121 View Post
I have an interview coming up with Air Wisconsin, I have a few questions for any AWAC pilots on property:

Is it possible to group blocks of days off longer than 3 days if I volunteer for reserve or junior manning during the rest of the month? I will be commuting from the Southwest for a while and longer stretches off preceded or followed by longer stretches working is more feasible for me. Any info on this is greatly appreciated.
Big bag of nopes on that one. Once you get a line you "might" get lucky and get some swaps approved to get time off, but realistically you need some seniority to get long stretches of time off. Easiest way when you're semi junior is bidding integration days off (end of one month and beginning of next month). When I was a fairly junior fo line holder I'd get 4-5 off consistently that way. You'll get shafted with carry in days for awhile. Or do what most everyone else does when they get burned out with not enough time off and call out sick.
pitchtrim is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Crawl
CommutAir
5406
03-21-2020 06:45 AM
P-3Bubba
Major
174
04-23-2014 06:14 AM
bgmann
Regional
31
11-19-2011 07:33 PM
RPC Unity
Union Talk
149
06-30-2011 08:39 PM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices