Search
Notices
Air Wisconsin Regional Airline

Future of Air Wisconsin

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-2017, 01:06 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: Downward Dog
Posts: 1,877
Default

Originally Posted by Grumbletrousers View Post
For now. Once they build up their WO they’ll throw the contact carries away.
Build up their WO? PSA might have doubled, but Envoy is a shell of what is was. I don't see shifting planes from one WO to another as building.
Sure ZW left AA flying but in the past few years nearly every regional out there has announced more American flying.

The WO narrative is one that AA tells their WO.
WesternSkies is offline  
Old 12-22-2017, 01:33 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 237
Default

Originally Posted by WesternSkies View Post
Build up their WO? PSA might have doubled, but Envoy is a shell of what is was. I don't see shifting planes from one WO to another as building.
Sure ZW left AA flying but in the past few years nearly every regional out there has announced more American flying.

The WO narrative is one that AA tells their WO.
Delta gave 9E the highest pay in the industry as a way to build their operations and rid the contract-carriers from their books. They can do this because they have the monetary backing from Delta. American will likely do the same.

Like it or not companies like Republic, Trans States and SkyWest won’t be able to compete if pilot pay keeps going up. Profit margins will shrink, and companies will either merge or fold.

I’m not saying it will happen overnight. But fee-for-departure airlines will be a thing of the past sooner rather than later.
Grumbletrousers is offline  
Old 12-25-2017, 09:04 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
chrisreedrules's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 4,599
Default

Originally Posted by WesternSkies View Post
Build up their WO? PSA might have doubled, but Envoy is a shell of what is was. I don't see shifting planes from one WO to another as building.
Sure ZW left AA flying but in the past few years nearly every regional out there has announced more American flying.

The WO narrative is one that AA tells their WO.
More 175s will go to Envoy. I would expect to see the CPZ 175s head to Envoy in the next couple years. The 145s would have never gone to Piedmont except for the fact that the FAA scoffed when managment went to them with the plan to fly 175s coming from old dash-8’s. They wanted Piedmont to fly the 145 before they put anything else on their certificate. The CRJs that Envoy flew were/are transferring to PSA because it will save AAG millions by having each of their WO regional airlines fly primarily one single fleet type. PSA has been told that we are ultimately going to end up being around 150-165 airplanes and mostly CRJ900 fleet type. Piedmont is growing their 145 fleet until they can no longer grow. Envoy is transferring some aircraft, flowing a ton of pilots, and will refleet primarily with 175s as time goes on.

No one really knows exactly what will happen with the AAG WOs. The merger between USAir and America West was never truly finished when USAir merged with American Airlines. There are still a lot of things left to work out and a lot of changes coming at mainline as synergies are realized. Once they have taken care of things at mainline AAG will be looking to get its house in order and I may expect to see some structural changes at the WOs or perhaps a plan that may include some absorption of sorts. All I know is 3 separate regional management’s and all of the associated costs don’t make a lot of fiscal sense. I think ultimately we’ll see more AAG regional flying brought “in house” to the WOs and some big changes over the next few years. Time will tell.
chrisreedrules is offline  
Old 12-26-2017, 04:22 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 263
Default

Originally Posted by chrisreedrules View Post
More 175s will go to Envoy. I would expect to see the CPZ 175s head to Envoy in the next couple years. The 145s would have never gone to Piedmont except for the fact that the FAA scoffed when managment went to them with the plan to fly 175s coming from old dash-8’s. They wanted Piedmont to fly the 145 before they put anything else on their certificate. The CRJs that Envoy flew were/are transferring to PSA because it will save AAG millions by having each of their WO regional airlines fly primarily one single fleet type. PSA has been told that we are ultimately going to end up being around 150-165 airplanes and mostly CRJ900 fleet type. Piedmont is growing their 145 fleet until they can no longer grow. Envoy is transferring some aircraft, flowing a ton of pilots, and will refleet primarily with 175s as time goes on.

No one really knows exactly what will happen with the AAG WOs. The merger between USAir and America West was never truly finished when USAir merged with American Airlines. There are still a lot of things left to work out and a lot of changes coming at mainline as synergies are realized. Once they have taken care of things at mainline AAG will be looking to get its house in order and I may expect to see some structural changes at the WOs or perhaps a plan that may include some absorption of sorts. All I know is 3 separate regional management’s and all of the associated costs don’t make a lot of fiscal sense. I think ultimately we’ll see more AAG regional flying brought “in house” to the WOs and some big changes over the next few years. Time will tell.
Could be ...but AA continues to hand out flying to other regionals frequently. AA just gave new routes to Mesa and Express Jet. I’m watching Delta for the future structure of regional flying. It’s my understanding they’re working towards a 80/20 rule on regional flying. 80% mainline and 20% Endeavor.
Inop2 is offline  
Old 12-26-2017, 05:17 PM
  #15  
Put me in your mouth
 
stroopwaffle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: something bigger
Posts: 106
Default

I am pretty happy not to be flying for AA anymore.
stroopwaffle is offline  
Old 12-27-2017, 12:14 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
billyho's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,450
Default

Originally Posted by stroopwaffle View Post
I am pretty happy not to be flying for AA anymore.
That's totally True. I know many contract carriers loved how US Airways treated them. Honestly flying for American I do miss our US Airways culture. Hopefully with the incredible movement at American it will change over the next 5 years.
Good Luck with United. I remember when AWAC folks were glad to be gone from them. Life is a big circle sometimes.
billyho is offline  
Old 12-27-2017, 04:19 AM
  #17  
Put me in your mouth
 
stroopwaffle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: something bigger
Posts: 106
Default

It's hard to admit and I threw up in my mouth a little, but I agree with Billyho. USAirways liked AWAC much better than (the new) AA does.

At least for the next 5-7 years, the contract with UA has an exclusivity clause. We wont be flying for anyone else.
stroopwaffle is offline  
Old 12-27-2017, 08:00 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
andili61's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: Flaps & Ldg Gear Executive Director
Posts: 100
Default

Originally Posted by stroopwaffle View Post
It's hard to admit and I threw up in my mouth a little, but I agree with Billyho. USAirways liked AWAC much better than (the new) AA does.

At least for the next 5-7 years, the contract with UA has an exclusivity clause. We wont be flying for anyone else.
I don't know if being exclusive with United is good or bad. United is extremely cheapie when it comes to its regionals. Sad but true
andili61 is offline  
Old 12-27-2017, 10:53 AM
  #19  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,291
Default

Originally Posted by stroopwaffle View Post
It's hard to admit and I threw up in my mouth a little, but I agree with Billyho. USAirways liked AWAC much better than (the new) AA does.

At least for the next 5-7 years, the contract with UA has an exclusivity clause. We wont be flying for anyone else.
Personally i think they are setting AWAC up for a buyout in the near future. Before its all said and done United will acquire and operate awac, xjet and commutair as its wo's.They are realizing its the best way to fully protect and manage its feed into the hub cities.
idlethrust is offline  
Old 12-27-2017, 05:08 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
prex8390's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,146
Default

Originally Posted by idlethrust View Post
Personally i think they are setting AWAC up for a buyout in the near future. Before its all said and done United will acquire and operate awac, xjet and commutair as its wo's.They are realizing its the best way to fully protect and manage its feed into the hub cities.
United will be the king of the old, tired 50 seaters at the end of that buyout. Just becuase AA has 3 WO doesn’t mean united will. Delta only has one and that seems to be the carrier everyone follows. When Delta doesn’t renew gojets contract this coming spring (which is being wildly rumored) there might be more incentive to have them as a WO with their scope claused 700s.

Last edited by prex8390; 12-27-2017 at 05:24 PM.
prex8390 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
iahflyr
Air Wisconsin
156
07-07-2017 04:14 PM
Freightbird
FedEx
22
08-12-2016 11:12 PM
airborne42
Air Wisconsin
4
05-29-2011 03:49 PM
Whacker77
Air Wisconsin
2
08-29-2009 06:33 PM
StormChaser
Major
378
08-10-2009 12:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices