jet Blue and Alaska?
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: Driving a Bus for Recreational Pleasure.
Posts: 544
jet Blue and Alaska?
Saw this on another thread and was wondering what’s up. JFK base closure followed by reduced growth etc etc etc and now this:
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/20/jetblue-reshuffles-corporate-headquarters-braces-workers-for-layoffs.html
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/20/jetblue-reshuffles-corporate-headquarters-braces-workers-for-layoffs.html
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: Left, right & center
Posts: 772
I don't see anything particularly strange about the way that was stated. It's a clear contrast of voluntary vs. involuntary. Everybody knows what it means.
Some of you need to take off your jade-colored glasses.
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 341
"We aimed to reduce the number of involuntary departures by offering voluntary buyouts and by eliminating a number of open positions."
I don't see anything particularly strange about the way that was stated. It's a clear contrast of voluntary vs. involuntary. Everybody knows what it means.
Some of you need to take off your jade-colored glasses.
I don't see anything particularly strange about the way that was stated. It's a clear contrast of voluntary vs. involuntary. Everybody knows what it means.
Some of you need to take off your jade-colored glasses.
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: Left, right & center
Posts: 772
He was speaking to normal people who understand conversational English and don't have an axe to grind. I'm sure when they spoke to the pilots, they used simple, single-syllable words that they could easily understand: "We no fire you right now. Go fly planes. Bye bye!"
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 341
There weren't any extra words. "Involuntary departures" contrasts directly with "voluntary buyouts" - it's clear, requires fewer words and is smoother than, "We aimed to reduce the number of employees we would need to fire or lay off by offering to pay people to leave."
He was speaking to normal people who understand conversational English and don't have an axe to grind. I'm sure when they spoke to the pilots, they used simple, single-syllable words that they could easily understand: "We no fire you right now. Go fly planes. Bye bye!"
He was speaking to normal people who understand conversational English and don't have an axe to grind. I'm sure when they spoke to the pilots, they used simple, single-syllable words that they could easily understand: "We no fire you right now. Go fly planes. Bye bye!"
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: Left, right & center
Posts: 772
I don't look at the world through rose-colored glasses. I just find it takes way too much energy to maintain the APC airline pilot forum level of cynicism and outrage.
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: Driving a Bus for Recreational Pleasure.
Posts: 544
I think the perfect play would be AS/HA/B6. All three rely heavily on codeshares. Now, I’m not sure what AA would think of that and I think the next move will be big and expensive. Yes, a possible downturn in the economy could be in the minds of airline management, but it seems these companies are gearing up and settling the books for another merger. Who? That’s the million dollar question. I know for sure that many are hoping for something sooner than later.
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 323
AS/B6 would require a JCBA with a modification to the brand new scope clause that doesn't allow block purchase agreements like Horizon or Skywest. I don't think you'd get a majority of pilots to go along with that without throwing more money at it than it's worth.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post