![]() |
Originally Posted by MarkThyme
(Post 2670421)
Hey, that's great! I guess you really showed them. They are clearly super-annoyed.
And what do you have to show for it? Scope? Industry-leading pay? DB retirement? Massive management reorganization as a result of the orange "no confidence vote"? Tell me! Arbitration... hopefully never again. However the lanyards as cheesy as they are certainly strike a nerve and are effective. 2020 will be MUCH more ugly as this group has a much stronger backbone. Clearly you’re a Troll so I’ll stop feeding. |
Originally Posted by MarkThyme
(Post 2670096)
Or maybe I'm a career professional who has seen union members do some pretty obnoxious but ultimately meaningless stuff, believing that anybody else cares about their gripes and thinking that if they just annoy management enough, they can make the company relent and change course.
You are not the big deal you think you are. Tame your ego, and see the world a little more clearly. It appears you have only responded to two airlines dealing with labor issues.... us and ATI/ABX.... nothin at all suspicicious about that.... |
“Greedy Bastages”... still my favorite
|
Originally Posted by IFlyNFish
(Post 2670424)
Arbitration... hopefully never again. However the lanyards as cheesy as they are certainly strike a nerve and are effective.
If your goal is to annoy management, then hey - mission accomplished! They are clearly effective at doing that. If, however, you're actually trying to improve your lot in life, your orange lanyards haven't accomplished anything.
Originally Posted by IFlyNFish
(Post 2670424)
2020 will be MUCH more ugly as this group has a much stronger backbone.
Originally Posted by IFlyNFish
(Post 2670424)
Clearly you’re a Troll so I’ll stop feeding.
|
Mark,
It’s easy to sit back as an observer and throw stones. It’s much harder to actually do the homework. First, the union failed the pilot group. They did launch the lanyard campaign which really hit home but then they buckled and gave it away for nothing. Second, the union had no strategic vision. They didn’t lead from the front. There was no plan. I think they were asleep at the wheel or just plain negligent. Third, many in the pilot group couldn’t figure out that their actions, in validating a minimum staffing model, brought a ton of pain on the group. The negotiating committee....both for the contract and SLI had their collective heads up their a88es. So, being a simple-minded troll and saying the lanyards has no purpose is idiotic. They do have a unification purpose and were doing great. The union, which was grossly negligent let us all down. Thanks CN and SH! And this apathetic lazy pilot group let them get away with it. |
So what happened yesterday that is detrimental to our careers?
|
Originally Posted by MarkThyme
(Post 2670227)
So what you're saying here is that the orange lanyards with the "This merger won't fly without pilots" slogan worked brilliantly, because the merger happened anyway, even without pilot group support, and now base chief pilots are dropping like flies. But surely, new orange lanyards with a new slogan will work next time for sure. They'll know you really mean business this time.
My original argument stands. You want a contract with all that stuff you're wishing for? You're going to have to go scorched earth. You're going to have to be willing to go four years beyond the amendable date - no arbitration - so that nobody wants to apply until a contract gets done. Pilots need to leave in droves, not a few here and a few there. Recruiters at job fairs need to be left waiting for anybody to come talk to them. New-hire classes need a no-show rate of 50% or more. You need to get to the point where the only pilots they can hire are the ones who can't get a job anywhere else, or end up washing out of training. Do that, and then you will have their attention. Don't you think it might be easier to settle for the first offer presented, and just live with the results? |
Originally Posted by Caveman
(Post 2673987)
This sounds like a lot of work.
Don't you think it might be easier to settle for the first offer presented, and just live with the results? |
Originally Posted by av8or
(Post 2674007)
😂😂😂 Well put.
|
Originally Posted by Pogey Bait
(Post 2674037)
Zero sarcasm + enter.......
|
Originally Posted by Caveman
(Post 2673987)
This sounds like a lot of work.
One was the 2200 pages of documentation in 5 or 6 notebooks explaining why our side should win the baseball pay arbitration. The other was a Manila folder with the Company's 20 Power Point slides. "We'll obviously win." Unfortunately the MEC leadership forgot that the Arbitrator doesn't weigh the evidence by throwing it on a scale. We got Kasherstrated. |
Kasher was 2005. You've had contracts since then. But now at this point it's like a guy going through his fourth divorce, and keeps talking about how he wouldn't be in this position if his first wife hadn't divorced him. And contract 2013 was "Contract $200/hr" and not contract-fix-what-kasher-lost-us. And who made the pensions go away and the whole rebalance and DC-only pilot plan? Was that Kasher? Forced by a judge? Or, pilots voted it away? You don't have to answer.
|
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 2682172)
Kasher was 2005. You've had contracts since then. But now at this point it's like a guy going through his fourth divorce, and keeps talking about how he wouldn't be in this position if his first wife hadn't divorced him. And contract 2013 was "Contract $200/hr" and not contract-fix-what-kasher-lost-us. And who made the pensions go away and the whole rebalance and DC-only pilot plan? Was that Kasher? Forced by a judge? Or, pilots voted it away? You don't have to answer.
|
Shy and Flyin, both of your points are critical to our collective future.
The history lesson and the way forward. Examining our history and learning from it should be the underpinnings of the road ahead. The obstacles that we face are significant. The largest,by a substantial margin, is us and by that I mean the original Alaska pilot group. 70 plus percent of us place a much higher value on our residential zip code than we do a collective bargaining ageeement that represents our contribution to Alaska Airlines inc.. To live within an hour of pdx/sea and to a lesser extent anc/lax is the ruler that we measure the value of our contract with. By any measure that has placed us 7th or 8th amongst our peers. This obvious self-depreciation has led the executives of this company to not only view us with comtempt but to incorporate this “gift” from us into their business plan. Think “Secret Sauce”... Ben Minicucci was genuine when he testified to that end in the Arbitration hearing. So here we are. JCBA negotiations were an absolute failure on our part. Alaska Airlines is facing significant competive pressure coupled with rising fuel costs. Profits will likely stay flat or turn to losses over the next couple of years. The unity that the two groups built during JCBA negotiations was predictably damaged during SLI negotiations. What remains of it will be finished off in 2 weeks. We are facing a well scripted management group that spends many millions on the best, most skilled, anti-labor law firms in the country. They have been “negotiating”with us since the ink dried on “contract 200”. They have the best playbook in the industry and will be negotiating in the most favorable competitive and economic conditions for a zero-net gain contract. 2020 will turn into 2022 in the blink of an eye. Personally I see this growing storm as an opportunity. As a blood-fest. As an opportunity to rid ourselves of the poison that has prevented contractual gains in my 19 plus years here. As an opportunity to finally have union leadership and more importantly union membership that places contractual quality and integrity well above zip-code preference. If we need to hoist the old “skull and cross bones”, sharpen our knives and “slit some throats” to get it done the so be it. |
Originally Posted by Klsytakesit
(Post 2682409)
Shy and Flyin, both of your points are critical to our collective future.
The history lesson and the way forward. Examining our history and learning from it should be the underpinnings of the road ahead. The obstacles that we face are significant. The largest,by a substantial margin, is us and by that I mean the original Alaska pilot group. 70 plus percent of us place a much higher value on our residential zip code than we do a collective bargaining ageeement that represents our contribution to Alaska Airlines inc.. To live within an hour of pdx/sea and to a lesser extent anc/lax is the ruler that we measure the value of our contract with. By any measure that has placed us 7th or 8th amongst our peers. This obvious self-depreciation has led the executives of this company to not only view us with comtempt but to incorporate this “gift” from us into their business plan. Think “Secret Sauce”... Ben Minicucci was genuine when he testified to that end in the Arbitration hearing. So here we are. JCBA negotiations were an absolute failure on our part. Alaska Airlines is facing significant competive pressure coupled with rising fuel costs. Profits will likely stay flat or turn to losses over the next couple of years. The unity that the two groups built during JCBA negotiations was predictably damaged during SLI negotiations. What remains of it will be finished off in 2 weeks. We are facing a well scripted management group that spends many millions on the best, most skilled, anti-labor law firms in the country. They have been “negotiating”with us since the ink dried on “contract 200”. They have the best playbook in the industry and will be negotiating in the most favorable competitive and economic conditions for a zero-net gain contract. 2020 will turn into 2022 in the blink of an eye. Personally I see this growing storm as an opportunity. As a blood-fest. As an opportunity to rid ourselves of the poison that has prevented contractual gains in my 19 plus years here. As an opportunity to finally have union leadership and more importantly union membership that places contractual quality and integrity well above zip-code preference. If we need to hoist the old “skull and cross bones”, sharpen our knives and “slit some throats” to get it done the so be it. Add to that Alaska Airlines is fast running out of qualified candidates that live or want to live within an Alaska base driving radius. |
+1 Klsytakesit, great post. Agreed and thank you!
|
Originally Posted by MarkThyme
(Post 2669362)
Yeah - wear those orange lanyards! That'll show 'em you really mean business! They'll cave in a second in the face of such a show of strength!
The company also had a computer code of PF and PNF to indicate on its paperwork whether the named pilot was Pilot Flying or Pilot Not Flying for this particular flight. Somebody made orange stickers with PNF in bold letters. These to be prominently displayed wherever – luggage, uniform coat lapels, cockpit, uniform hat (normal back then) and even bathroom stalls. Yes, the company saw these, but the real audience was your fellow pilot. You were making a show of support for possible strike action and most importantly, support of your fellow pilots. |
Originally Posted by fireman0174
(Post 2682806)
Before the UAL strike in 1985 the company provided orange bag tags to indicate flight crew luggage that should be put aside the belt loader for loading last and pulled off first from manual cargo pits.
The company also had a computer code of PF and PNF to indicate on its paperwork whether the named pilot was Pilot Flying or Pilot Not Flying for this particular flight. Somebody made orange stickers with PNF in bold letters. These to be prominently displayed wherever – luggage, uniform coat lapels, cockpit, uniform hat (normal back then) and even bathroom stalls. Yes, the company saw these, but the real audience was your fellow pilot. You were making a show of support for possible strike action and most importantly, support of your fellow pilots. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:44 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands