Oops 3
#1
Oops 3
From the Seattle Times:
November 2, 2018 at 9:26 pm
Former Alaska Airlines pilot sues airline, contending he was wrongly fired amid false rape claims
The pilot claims the co-pilot made up the rape allegation to avoid being fired. Updated 9:46 pm
https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle...e-rape-claims/
November 2, 2018 at 9:26 pm
Former Alaska Airlines pilot sues airline, contending he was wrongly fired amid false rape claims
The pilot claims the co-pilot made up the rape allegation to avoid being fired. Updated 9:46 pm
https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle...e-rape-claims/
#3
Swimmin' in da pool
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 444
From the Seattle Times:
November 2, 2018 at 9:26 pm
Former Alaska Airlines pilot sues airline, contending he was wrongly fired amid false rape claims
The pilot claims the co-pilot made up the rape allegation to avoid being fired. Updated 9:46 pm
https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle...e-rape-claims/
November 2, 2018 at 9:26 pm
Former Alaska Airlines pilot sues airline, contending he was wrongly fired amid false rape claims
The pilot claims the co-pilot made up the rape allegation to avoid being fired. Updated 9:46 pm
https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle...e-rape-claims/
Among many other 'assumptions', some of which of you described as potentially criminal (Quote "The woman is waving the flag to excuse behavior that - if not criminal - is at least reprehensible), this:
Quote: "And seriously, best case scenario that a sixty-four year old married supervisor plied someone a quarter of a century younger than him with booze and she wound up in bed with him is NOT going to sit well with the jury."
Hmmm, your attached Seattle Times article lists FO Pina as a 40 year old and Capt Engelian as 51, I'm no math whiz, but that's hardly a quarter century.
Pesky facts and inconvenient truths have a nasty tendency to ruin a great story! I'll withhold judgment till the dust settles. In the interest of preserving your credibility, I'd recommend you do the same.
Last edited by dawgdriver; 11-03-2018 at 10:49 AM.
#4
Just reading through your previous judgements and assertions on this case, I'm genuinely curious as to why you, of all people, would have posted this(?).
Among many other 'assumptions', some of which of you described as potentially criminal (Quote "The woman is waving the flag to excuse behavior that - if not criminal - is at least reprehensible), this:
Quote: "And seriously, best case scenario that a sixty-four year old married supervisor plied someone a quarter of a century younger than him with booze and she wound up in bed with him is NOT going to sit well with the jury."
Hmmm, your attached Seattle Times article lists FO Pina as a 40 year old and Capt Engelian as 51, I'm no math whiz, but that's hardly a quarter century.
Pesky facts and inconvenient truths have a nasty tendency to ruin a great story! I'll withhold judgment till the dust settles. In the interest of preserving your credibility, I'd recommend you do the same.
What I have now posted was THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STORY and it was posted without editorial comment. It makes it a whole lot easier to assess a situation when BOTH sides tell their story.
#9
Swimmin' in da pool
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 444
#slam-click
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,600
Though she certainly didn't help, she's not the first and actions such as hers have ensured safe, sterile, distant behavior in the workplace for the foreseeable future. Hypersensitive and over-reactive HR departments make it a habit to discipline employees for casual conversation/opinions that snowflakes find offensive or objectionable. Sad (and boring) but true, but who needs it? Not worth the risk in today's #Guilty till proven innocent environment. Keep it PC; strictly business.
#slam-click
#slam-click
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post