Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
Alaska General Discussion >

Alaska General Discussion

Search
Notices

Alaska General Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2022, 10:08 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Exclamation Alaska General Discussion

You’re right, my fault, I’ll only settle for $445-500/hr per the APC math above.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 09-05-2022, 04:20 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: GearBbychoice
Posts: 159
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
You’re right, my fault, I’ll only settle for $445-500/hr per the APC math above.
if it’s not $446-551/hr it’s no vote for me
Flaps1check is offline  
Old 09-05-2022, 07:13 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
av8or's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: This side of the dirt.
Posts: 890
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post

That much is plausible... from the company perspective a large bonus/retro will only enrich a bunch of people right before they bang out.

That's also slightly plausible.
Well, that’ll be a gross miscalculation on their part. Their inability to see the forest for the trees and stall for years is not going to be underwritten with my retro pay. Plus, ok, so, those people walk after getting their retro check… good for them. They theoretically gave up seniority at their next carrier in order to get a retro check.

Swear to god, it never ceases to amaze me the degree to which corporations expect to get something for free their employees.
av8or is offline  
Old 09-05-2022, 10:02 AM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Posts: 37
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
Another view could be, regional wages should never have been what they have been over the years. RJ pay should be about 70% of NB rates at mainline. Regional pay has been insanely low for far too long. Just because they get $215 doesn’t mean legacy carriers need to get 450-500. Using the 70% ballpark, 215/.7 = 307. I guess I’m not understanding that just because the pay was 129 at QX and 266 at AS, and now that QX is 215, our pay needs to be linear like that and be 450/hr. Or we could recognize that RJ pay has always been historically low, they should have never been worse than 65-70% of mainline rates. And perhaps this is a move to fix that? Because by doing linear math and saying we should get 450-500/hr, you’re essentially saying you want Horizon to make half what you make. I understand the seat argument, but I don’t buy that for the regional industry. One, these jets should never have been outsourced. Delta already has payrates in their mainline contract for CRJ900s. Two, now that they are at regionals, their pay should never have been worse than 60-70% of mainline NB rates. IMHO - and it obviously isn’t with a lot - I don’t want to see regionals get left behind at 50% or less of mainline rates again.

Mainline - X
Regional - 65-70% within X

Just my 2 cents. I’d be okay with QX at 215 and AS at 320 at DOS. But y’all do y’all’s
Will you stop posting what you’re ok with in terms of rates ? Pilots telling the company what rates they’re ok with undermine our union’s work. Common sense, come on!
Miltocivil is offline  
Old 09-05-2022, 12:33 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 287
Default

Originally Posted by flyprdu View Post
You just said that a ratio of 1.43:1 (70%) seemed like an appropriate amount. By the way, you pulled that completely out of thin air. Two pages ago you lambasted anyone who used a long-standing method of gauging pay, by seats and a ratio of 2.5:1, as being wildly unreasonable. Why is using your linear scale acceptable, while others are not?

For some reason you think that if mainline gets a proportional raise that it somehow diminishes the raise that the regional pilots just received. Please elaborate. Because a raise is a raise. All because others at another company also receive a raise does not impact you at all. In fact it's probably beneficial, as it creates more upward pressure on your employer to match again.

And it's simple math. You are advocating for regionals to get closer to mainlines in pay. In order for that to happen, mainline pay would have to have slower or frozen progress while regionals gain ground. So you did actually say it. You only wrapped those words in "won't someone think of the poor regional pilots!"

I don't understand what you're even arguing at this point, but you sure do want everyone to accept $320 as quickly as possible.
Yes, You get it.

A 5-year AAG regional CA:
$213.75 for 76 seats

How much should an AA 321 CA get for 196 seats?
On a per-seat basis, that's over $550 per hour... ($551.25)

Not even talking about widebody pay here.

Food for thought for every mainline / legacy pilot whose company is behind on their contract...
FlyingSlowly is offline  
Old 09-05-2022, 03:19 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

Originally Posted by Miltocivil View Post
Will you stop posting what you’re ok with in terms of rates ? Pilots telling the company what rates they’re ok with undermine our union’s work. Common sense, come on!
The $320 was the latest shared rate of the union ask/proposal.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 09-05-2022, 03:58 PM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 77
Default

That was nearly a half a year ago, inflation continues to rage on so no longer applicable
Yogipilot is online now  
Old 09-05-2022, 05:28 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NotTellin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: Upright & Breathing
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
The $320 was the latest shared rate of the union ask/proposal.
Things change. That was almost 2 years ago. That number is no longer valid after the recent increases and expected increases at other carriers. I know for a fact that ALPA has asked that we all not talk about what we would or would not take publicly. But you continue to undermine our NC with your posts.
NotTellin is offline  
Old 09-05-2022, 08:57 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

Originally Posted by NotTellin View Post
Things change. That was almost 2 years ago. That number is no longer valid after the recent increases and expected increases at other carriers. I know for a fact that ALPA has asked that we all not talk about what we would or would not take publicly. But you continue to undermine our NC with your posts.
2 years? That was barely 6 months ago. It’s the latest union proposal that was put out in March.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 09-05-2022, 09:06 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NotTellin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: Upright & Breathing
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
2 years? That was barely 6 months ago. It’s the latest union proposal that was put out in March.
And yet you still miss the point.
NotTellin is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gooddeal
Major
1245
07-06-2014 05:54 PM
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
Kilgore Trout
Part 135
46
06-19-2009 03:35 AM
Ak Pilot
Major
7
07-10-2008 09:30 AM
WatchThis!
Major
0
07-10-2005 03:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices