Alaska General Discussion
#3
Swear to god, it never ceases to amaze me the degree to which corporations expect to get something for free their employees.
#4
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Posts: 37
Another view could be, regional wages should never have been what they have been over the years. RJ pay should be about 70% of NB rates at mainline. Regional pay has been insanely low for far too long. Just because they get $215 doesn’t mean legacy carriers need to get 450-500. Using the 70% ballpark, 215/.7 = 307. I guess I’m not understanding that just because the pay was 129 at QX and 266 at AS, and now that QX is 215, our pay needs to be linear like that and be 450/hr. Or we could recognize that RJ pay has always been historically low, they should have never been worse than 65-70% of mainline rates. And perhaps this is a move to fix that? Because by doing linear math and saying we should get 450-500/hr, you’re essentially saying you want Horizon to make half what you make. I understand the seat argument, but I don’t buy that for the regional industry. One, these jets should never have been outsourced. Delta already has payrates in their mainline contract for CRJ900s. Two, now that they are at regionals, their pay should never have been worse than 60-70% of mainline NB rates. IMHO - and it obviously isn’t with a lot - I don’t want to see regionals get left behind at 50% or less of mainline rates again.
Mainline - X
Regional - 65-70% within X
Just my 2 cents. I’d be okay with QX at 215 and AS at 320 at DOS. But y’all do y’all’s
Mainline - X
Regional - 65-70% within X
Just my 2 cents. I’d be okay with QX at 215 and AS at 320 at DOS. But y’all do y’all’s
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 287
You just said that a ratio of 1.43:1 (70%) seemed like an appropriate amount. By the way, you pulled that completely out of thin air. Two pages ago you lambasted anyone who used a long-standing method of gauging pay, by seats and a ratio of 2.5:1, as being wildly unreasonable. Why is using your linear scale acceptable, while others are not?
For some reason you think that if mainline gets a proportional raise that it somehow diminishes the raise that the regional pilots just received. Please elaborate. Because a raise is a raise. All because others at another company also receive a raise does not impact you at all. In fact it's probably beneficial, as it creates more upward pressure on your employer to match again.
And it's simple math. You are advocating for regionals to get closer to mainlines in pay. In order for that to happen, mainline pay would have to have slower or frozen progress while regionals gain ground. So you did actually say it. You only wrapped those words in "won't someone think of the poor regional pilots!"
I don't understand what you're even arguing at this point, but you sure do want everyone to accept $320 as quickly as possible.
For some reason you think that if mainline gets a proportional raise that it somehow diminishes the raise that the regional pilots just received. Please elaborate. Because a raise is a raise. All because others at another company also receive a raise does not impact you at all. In fact it's probably beneficial, as it creates more upward pressure on your employer to match again.
And it's simple math. You are advocating for regionals to get closer to mainlines in pay. In order for that to happen, mainline pay would have to have slower or frozen progress while regionals gain ground. So you did actually say it. You only wrapped those words in "won't someone think of the poor regional pilots!"
I don't understand what you're even arguing at this point, but you sure do want everyone to accept $320 as quickly as possible.
A 5-year AAG regional CA:
$213.75 for 76 seats
How much should an AA 321 CA get for 196 seats?
On a per-seat basis, that's over $550 per hour... ($551.25)
Not even talking about widebody pay here.
Food for thought for every mainline / legacy pilot whose company is behind on their contract...
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
#8
Things change. That was almost 2 years ago. That number is no longer valid after the recent increases and expected increases at other carriers. I know for a fact that ALPA has asked that we all not talk about what we would or would not take publicly. But you continue to undermine our NC with your posts.
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Things change. That was almost 2 years ago. That number is no longer valid after the recent increases and expected increases at other carriers. I know for a fact that ALPA has asked that we all not talk about what we would or would not take publicly. But you continue to undermine our NC with your posts.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post