Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Allegiant
Spirit And management working cohesively >

Spirit And management working cohesively

Notices

Spirit And management working cohesively

Old 08-31-2020, 07:50 AM
  #121  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 136
Default

Originally Posted by Nick Bradshaw View Post
Thump, thump, thump. Have it your way. Gonna be an interesting week. Stay tuned.
is that a threat? What do you know?
Alexander12 is offline  
Old 08-31-2020, 08:39 AM
  #122  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 645
Default

Originally Posted by ramalama View Post
I'm plagiarizing "Pipe" but it bears repeating in this discussion:

Furlough mitigation is a fallacy that has haunted pilot group after pilot group. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS FURLOUGH MITIGATION!!!! (with the exception of early retirement options) Do not be manipulated by false hope. If Allegiant or any other airline is bleeding, they will not be retaining anyone they don't absolutely have to (pilot or otherwise) even if they take a $1/yr salary. When you're bleeding, you try to stop the bleeding. Management isn't looking for an acceptable rate of sustained bleeding that aligns with the Core 4 principles, they are headed to the ER to amputate. Furlough mitigation is a deep well of false hope and misleading promises that are used to sabotage contracts. Don't be a sucker.
Ummmm... are you not familiar with what Spirit was able to do with their robust EIL/VIL participation (their version of an ETO). They not only mitigated furloughs, they completely avoided furloughs because the VOLUNTARY participation was so high by the senior pilots.

You're an idiot if you don't think VOLUNTARY leaves can mitigate furloughs. Do some research. Talk to pilots at NK, AS or B6.

If you're misconstruing VOLUNTARY participation with forced concessions, then I would agree with you. Taking involuntary concessions, or forced leaves out of seniority order is not the right approach IMO (not sure any airline has gone down this road). But voluntary leaves like an ETO that are tied to furlough mitigation absolutely work to reduce furloughs. Literally every single major airline and their pilots have agreed to a furlough mitigation package. F9 and NK had no early out options, just voluntary leaves to reduce furloughs of the most junior pilots. That is a no brainer. NK agreed to 50 hours; F9 agreed to 35 hours. There is seriously no reason why we couldn't have the same VOLUNTARY option to take an ETO.
captnate702 is offline  
Old 08-31-2020, 08:50 AM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
labbats's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A320
Posts: 1,347
Default

Random posts decrying union activity on a message board. Check

Upset junior folks who think that senior pilots don’t care when they really do. Check
(one post from one pilot doesn’t signify all of us)

Uneducated people posting instead of calling or texting a union rep to learn more. Check
(This while we have videos explaining all thought processes and proposals on both Facebook and our website.)


A litany of broken rules and promises and you want to jump on a company suggestion? You do realize we won a ruling on must work days and the company still violates that?

Andrew and company work harder than you’ll ever know and deal with outrageous proposals daily. Trust in them and the process.

We offered them a zero interest loan. Denied

We simply asked they award all ETO offered. Denied

They want to work around seniority. Why would any work group accept that?

Last edited by labbats; 08-31-2020 at 09:26 AM.
labbats is offline  
Old 08-31-2020, 09:20 AM
  #124  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 99
Default

Originally Posted by captnate702 View Post
Ummmm... are you not familiar with what Spirit was able to do with their robust EIL/VIL participation (their version of an ETO). They not only mitigated furloughs, they completely avoided furloughs because the VOLUNTARY participation was so high by the senior pilots.

You're an idiot if you don't think VOLUNTARY leaves can mitigate furloughs. Do some research. Talk to pilots at NK, AS or B6.

If you're misconstruing VOLUNTARY participation with forced concessions, then I would agree with you. Taking involuntary concessions, or forced leaves out of seniority order is not the right approach IMO (not sure any airline has gone down this road). But voluntary leaves like an ETO that are tied to furlough mitigation absolutely work to reduce furloughs. Literally every single major airline and their pilots have agreed to a furlough mitigation package. F9 and NK had no early out options, just voluntary leaves to reduce furloughs of the most junior pilots. That is a no brainer. NK agreed to 50 hours; F9 agreed to 35 hours. There is seriously no reason why we couldn't have the same VOLUNTARY option to take an ETO.

Allegiant is not interested in paying pilots to not work, at least if they can't gut the CBA. I don't know how else to say it. Sorry to burst your bubble.
ramalama is offline  
Old 08-31-2020, 09:57 AM
  #125  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 645
Default

Originally Posted by ramalama View Post
Allegiant is not interested in paying pilots to not work, at least if they can't gut the CBA. I don't know how else to say it. Sorry to burst your bubble.
What do you make of the ETO then? I'm harping on this because it is something that both parties already agreed to and has proven to help mitigate the extent of the furloughs in every other airline.
captnate702 is offline  
Old 08-31-2020, 10:03 AM
  #126  
Kabuki Kool
 
FreshWater's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Position: fu3king.airline@Furlough. DNA
Posts: 447
Default

Originally Posted by captnate702 View Post
What do you make of the ETO then? I'm harping on this because it is something that both parties already agreed to and has proven to help mitigate the extent of the furloughs in every other airline.
That’s been addressed by our exco. It seems management wants their cake and then some.
FreshWater is offline  
Old 08-31-2020, 11:05 AM
  #127  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,932
Default

Originally Posted by captnate702 View Post
What do you make of the ETO then? I'm harping on this because it is something that both parties already agreed to and has proven to help mitigate the extent of the furloughs in every other airline.
They are not offering early retirement like others in the industry.
tom11011 is offline  
Old 08-31-2020, 11:08 AM
  #128  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 218
Default

Originally Posted by tom11011 View Post
They are not offering early retirement like others in the industry.
This to me is absolute non sense. Why wouldn't you want to let the most senior (and expensive) go home early??
LoFly is offline  
Old 09-01-2020, 09:45 AM
  #129  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,735
Default

Originally Posted by LoFly View Post
This to me is absolute non sense. Why wouldn't you want to let the most senior (and expensive) go home early??
Probably because Allegiant's management doesn't see the company as a smaller airline in the future. Spirit management didn't want the idea of early retirement also. They have said that, they expect most of the demands to come back Spirit / Summer of next year. If we were to furlough 600 without our furlough mitigation. Everyone would been recall by Spiring of next year.
Silver02ex is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices