Search
Notices

C Series Order

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-03-2018, 09:00 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 321
Default

Scope guarantees that all aircraft above a certain size have to be flown by mainline American Airlines pilots. Without scope instead of paying a B737 CA 300k Parker could put the 737 at Envoy and have them fly it for 90k. More than half of AAL departures are operated by the regionals. Without scope that ratio would get worse and worse.
Laker24 is offline  
Old 07-03-2018, 10:19 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
redbaronahp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Position: B787 Captain
Posts: 163
Default

Originally Posted by Slowmover View Post
OK, I'll bite... new hire, military background, no idea what scope is or why this joke exists. Will someone explain it to me please?
On many occasions before getting hired at AA when riding the Jumpseat and making idle chit chat the pilots would say, you know we’re hiring. That comment has been heard by many regional pilots that have had their apps in at all the majors for many years. It’s not really a joke as a frustrating reality. When I interviewed I was told that there were over 6,000 active applications that had been updated within the past 90 days. It’s a competitive industry and the numbers I’ve seen are only about 10% of the new hires have a civilian only background and were hired off the street outside of a flow-through agreement. That’s less than 100 people per year.
redbaronahp is offline  
Old 07-03-2018, 10:26 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PRS Guitars's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 2,297
Default

Originally Posted by redbaronahp View Post
On many occasions before getting hired at AA when riding the Jumpseat and making idle chit chat the pilots would say, you know we’re hiring. That comment has been heard by many regional pilots that have had their apps in at all the majors for many years. It’s not really a joke as a frustrating reality. When I interviewed I was told that there were over 6,000 active applications that had been updated within the past 90 days. It’s a competitive industry and the numbers I’ve seen are only about 10% of the new hires have a civilian only background and were hired off the street outside of a flow-through agreement. That’s less than 100 people per year.
It’s not that they are military pilots saying “you know we’re hiring” it’s old guys that aren’t in touch with the hiring situation in the industry that say that.
PRS Guitars is offline  
Old 07-03-2018, 10:34 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PRS Guitars's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 2,297
Default

Originally Posted by Slowmover View Post
OK, I'll bite... new hire, military background, no idea what scope is or why this joke exists. Will someone explain it to me please?
It’s time for you to start learning this stuff (scope, etc), we have contract negotiations coming up, you need to be up to speed, and ready to recognize a bad TA (Tentative Agreement) and vote NO on it. In case you hadn’t learned yet, we have a lagging contract. PM me if you have any other questions, I was (am) military background as well.
PRS Guitars is offline  
Old 07-04-2018, 02:28 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,092
Default

Originally Posted by Cheddar View Post
Isom has mentioned in more than one crew news that they need a 100-130 seat airplane to fill in the gap and replace the E190/S80. They planned on A319Neos, but the Airbus majority acquisition of the C-Series and creation of the CSALP has probably killed the 319. Airbus has already stated that they would much rather sell 320/321 Neos as opposed to 319’s because of the higher margins. Also, I don’t think there are more than 10 A319Neos on order anywhere. It’s a loser for Airbus.

Boeing doesn’t have a 100 seat offering and I think at some point we will see A210’s and A230’s running around as part of future Airbus narrowbody deals. That’s unless we can buy every late model/slightly used 319 out there.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No one is buying the 319 because for $5m more you can get an airplane that seats almost 50% more people on only a slight increase in operating costs (the 321).
Name User is offline  
Old 07-04-2018, 04:04 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 290
Default

Originally Posted by Name User View Post
No one is buying the 319 because for $5m more you can get an airplane that seats almost 50% more people on only a slight increase in operating costs (the 321).
What ever happened to the “deal” with Frontier for their 319s?
BOGSAT is offline  
Old 07-04-2018, 06:05 AM
  #27  
Line Holder
 
Slowmover's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 55
Default

Thanks for the explanations!

Originally Posted by PRS Guitars View Post
It’s time for you to start learning this stuff (scope, etc), we have contract negotiations coming up, you need to be up to speed...
Yeah I know... as soon as I get off IOE I plan to spend more time on it. My APA mentor has been a huge help so far and I imagine that will continue.
Slowmover is offline  
Old 07-04-2018, 09:48 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 243
Default

Originally Posted by BOGSAT View Post
What ever happened to the “deal” with Frontier for their 319s?


Word is one is in paint this month.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Cactusone is offline  
Old 07-04-2018, 10:13 AM
  #29  
You scratched my anchor
 
Al Czervik's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,876
Default

Originally Posted by EMBFlyer View Post
Don't forget the one on C&R who said he'd vote against "junior pilot" contract wants because he's ****ed about the jumpseat.
Who wuz dat?!?!
Al Czervik is offline  
Old 07-04-2018, 03:11 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 108
Default

Originally Posted by Slowmover View Post
OK, I'll bite... new hire, military background, no idea what scope is or why this joke exists. Will someone explain it to me please?
To add to what others said, the way it will go down is the company will dangle a carrot of $$$ or whatever to get more scope relief in contract negotiations. Don't fall for it, that is why the industry is so screwed up already. The quick cash they try to tempt people with will never make up for the destruction of your career here long term. That is why half of the airline departures are now flown by people making peanuts living paycheck to paycheck for the last decade + and never get the chance to move up. If the jobs were still at AA and not at 10 different regionals the people at AA, DAL, UAL people wouldn't have been out on furlough forever and wouldn't have stagnated in the right seat with virtually no upwards progression for nearly 20 years while the regionals grew bigger and bigger now flying 4+ hour flights cross country paying an FO 24K a year.

The scary thing is there is so many old people here near retirement that literally don't give a damn about long term viability of the job here, many will sell out everyone in a second if given the opportunity. They will be happy to throw everyone under the bus, take the quick cash and be gone off into the sunset before everyones career here is wrecked and stagnated again due to more outsourcing cheaper labor at the regionals.

Scope needs to be reeled back in and the regionals need to die.

Last edited by Regionalsuck; 07-04-2018 at 03:24 PM.
Regionalsuck is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
scambo1
Delta
262
04-28-2016 05:38 AM
CLazarus
United
7
04-17-2016 02:20 AM
jsled
Major
37
12-23-2009 03:42 PM
WatchThis!
Major
8
04-01-2006 08:57 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices