LCW questions
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 492
LCW questions
Hoping you smart guys can educate me a little on LCW/PBS.
I have only been on the line since April. I am LGA based. I remember the top end of the LCW since I came on line being @90. For some reason I thought it would drop more this fall. Here are the LCW for LGA 737 FO the last 3 months:
NOV FOR DEC: 75:39-89:39
OCT FOR NOV: 76:24-90:24
SEP FOR OCT: 76:20-90:20
The contract talks about RALV:
(2) For Groups II through V aircraft ……. 74 and 82 credited hours
(then the JCBA goes on to talk about the company being able to raise it to 85hrs....at least thats what I "think" it says)
Sticking with 82 hours RALV.
If I add 7 hours to 82 I get 89hrs for the top end.
Questions:
1. are other bases always @90hrs on the top end or is that just a LGA thing since the base always has everyone leaving here like rats leaving a sinking ship.
2. assuming senior lineholders want the low end of the LCW (82 minus 7 = 75hrs) doesnt that mean junior lineholders will always get 90hr lines? 17 day lines.
3. Assuming I am under 50% lineholder seniority, will PBS build me a line to no more than 82hrs or less??? 15-16 day lines.
4. Is reducing the RALV a priority at all in negotiations? Did I miss that in the union emails?
I have only been on the line since April. I am LGA based. I remember the top end of the LCW since I came on line being @90. For some reason I thought it would drop more this fall. Here are the LCW for LGA 737 FO the last 3 months:
NOV FOR DEC: 75:39-89:39
OCT FOR NOV: 76:24-90:24
SEP FOR OCT: 76:20-90:20
The contract talks about RALV:
(2) For Groups II through V aircraft ……. 74 and 82 credited hours
(then the JCBA goes on to talk about the company being able to raise it to 85hrs....at least thats what I "think" it says)
Sticking with 82 hours RALV.
If I add 7 hours to 82 I get 89hrs for the top end.
Questions:
1. are other bases always @90hrs on the top end or is that just a LGA thing since the base always has everyone leaving here like rats leaving a sinking ship.
2. assuming senior lineholders want the low end of the LCW (82 minus 7 = 75hrs) doesnt that mean junior lineholders will always get 90hr lines? 17 day lines.
3. Assuming I am under 50% lineholder seniority, will PBS build me a line to no more than 82hrs or less??? 15-16 day lines.
4. Is reducing the RALV a priority at all in negotiations? Did I miss that in the union emails?
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 339
Hoping you smart guys can educate me a little on LCW/PBS.
I have only been on the line since April. I am LGA based. I remember the top end of the LCW since I came on line being @90. For some reason I thought it would drop more this fall. Here are the LCW for LGA 737 FO the last 3 months:
NOV FOR DEC: 75:39-89:39
OCT FOR NOV: 76:24-90:24
SEP FOR OCT: 76:20-90:20
The contract talks about RALV:
(2) For Groups II through V aircraft ……. 74 and 82 credited hours
(then the JCBA goes on to talk about the company being able to raise it to 85hrs....at least thats what I "think" it says)
Sticking with 82 hours RALV.
If I add 7 hours to 82 I get 89hrs for the top end.
Questions:
1. are other bases always @90hrs on the top end or is that just a LGA thing since the base always has everyone leaving here like rats leaving a sinking ship.
2. assuming senior lineholders want the low end of the LCW (82 minus 7 = 75hrs) doesnt that mean junior lineholders will always get 90hr lines? 17 day lines.
3. Assuming I am under 50% lineholder seniority, will PBS build me a line to no more than 82hrs or less??? 15-16 day lines.
4. Is reducing the RALV a priority at all in negotiations? Did I miss that in the union emails?
I have only been on the line since April. I am LGA based. I remember the top end of the LCW since I came on line being @90. For some reason I thought it would drop more this fall. Here are the LCW for LGA 737 FO the last 3 months:
NOV FOR DEC: 75:39-89:39
OCT FOR NOV: 76:24-90:24
SEP FOR OCT: 76:20-90:20
The contract talks about RALV:
(2) For Groups II through V aircraft ……. 74 and 82 credited hours
(then the JCBA goes on to talk about the company being able to raise it to 85hrs....at least thats what I "think" it says)
Sticking with 82 hours RALV.
If I add 7 hours to 82 I get 89hrs for the top end.
Questions:
1. are other bases always @90hrs on the top end or is that just a LGA thing since the base always has everyone leaving here like rats leaving a sinking ship.
2. assuming senior lineholders want the low end of the LCW (82 minus 7 = 75hrs) doesnt that mean junior lineholders will always get 90hr lines? 17 day lines.
3. Assuming I am under 50% lineholder seniority, will PBS build me a line to no more than 82hrs or less??? 15-16 day lines.
4. Is reducing the RALV a priority at all in negotiations? Did I miss that in the union emails?
Your questions overall bring a very good point about the level of hours being assigned during PBS bidding. Like you, I am interested and concerned.
#3
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 492
While I don’t have most of your answers, I have been emailing my base reps about your 4th question. I truly believe it should be a big priority in section 6.
Your questions overall bring a very good point about the level of hours being assigned during PBS bidding. Like you, I am interested and concerned.
Your questions overall bring a very good point about the level of hours being assigned during PBS bidding. Like you, I am interested and concerned.
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: A-320
Posts: 1,122
Hoping you smart guys can educate me a little on LCW/PBS.
I have only been on the line since April. I am LGA based. I remember the top end of the LCW since I came on line being @90. For some reason I thought it would drop more this fall. Here are the LCW for LGA 737 FO the last 3 months:
NOV FOR DEC: 75:39-89:39
OCT FOR NOV: 76:24-90:24
SEP FOR OCT: 76:20-90:20
The contract talks about RALV:
(2) For Groups II through V aircraft ……. 74 and 82 credited hours
(then the JCBA goes on to talk about the company being able to raise it to 85hrs....at least thats what I "think" it says)
Sticking with 82 hours RALV.
If I add 7 hours to 82 I get 89hrs for the top end.
Questions:
1. are other bases always @90hrs on the top end or is that just a LGA thing since the base always has everyone leaving here like rats leaving a sinking ship.
2. assuming senior lineholders want the low end of the LCW (82 minus 7 = 75hrs) doesnt that mean junior lineholders will always get 90hr lines? 17 day lines.
3. Assuming I am under 50% lineholder seniority, will PBS build me a line to no more than 82hrs or less??? 15-16 day lines.
4. Is reducing the RALV a priority at all in negotiations? Did I miss that in the union emails?
I have only been on the line since April. I am LGA based. I remember the top end of the LCW since I came on line being @90. For some reason I thought it would drop more this fall. Here are the LCW for LGA 737 FO the last 3 months:
NOV FOR DEC: 75:39-89:39
OCT FOR NOV: 76:24-90:24
SEP FOR OCT: 76:20-90:20
The contract talks about RALV:
(2) For Groups II through V aircraft ……. 74 and 82 credited hours
(then the JCBA goes on to talk about the company being able to raise it to 85hrs....at least thats what I "think" it says)
Sticking with 82 hours RALV.
If I add 7 hours to 82 I get 89hrs for the top end.
Questions:
1. are other bases always @90hrs on the top end or is that just a LGA thing since the base always has everyone leaving here like rats leaving a sinking ship.
2. assuming senior lineholders want the low end of the LCW (82 minus 7 = 75hrs) doesnt that mean junior lineholders will always get 90hr lines? 17 day lines.
3. Assuming I am under 50% lineholder seniority, will PBS build me a line to no more than 82hrs or less??? 15-16 day lines.
4. Is reducing the RALV a priority at all in negotiations? Did I miss that in the union emails?
1. Some bases are more seasonal than others so their LCW can fluctuate throughout the year. It's possible LGA is higher because of staffing always being low.
2. Essentially, yes, that is how it would work if the seniors bid low lines. ON your reason report it will show a required min line value. That value is calculated during the run, so you have no idea how many hours you have to work ahead of time. That number will go up or down based on what the people senior to you were awarded.
3. Not automatically. You would have to specifically bid low hours. 50% is not a magic number with PBS. Look at coverage days, especially in smaller bases. ORD/737/CA/I the number 2 guy has a coverage day. He's 2/40 in his base. He's bidding 5% and has a coverage day! If the 5% guy has a coverage day, it's quite possible the 5% guy also has a min required line value higher than the average.
4. I sure hope so. TTS/TTOT are next to useless. We'd be much better off being assigned fewer hours then pick up if you want to.
#5
Are we there yet??!!
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010
LCW is a sham.
Early on with PBS, you could actually say you wanted to fly the bottom end of the LCW and you would kinda get trips to reflect that. Now it will build you up to the min line value (whatever it is called) and disregard if you want to fly low time. For Nov, I wanted 73 hrs, the bottom of the LCW...PBS built me a month that was 83 hrs and did not award at least a dozen trips because of the min credit thing.
I still say this is all based on management bonuses (bone-us). By having everyone fly 5 more hrs per month, it reduces the number of bodies required by about 6 for every 100.
Early on with PBS, you could actually say you wanted to fly the bottom end of the LCW and you would kinda get trips to reflect that. Now it will build you up to the min line value (whatever it is called) and disregard if you want to fly low time. For Nov, I wanted 73 hrs, the bottom of the LCW...PBS built me a month that was 83 hrs and did not award at least a dozen trips because of the min credit thing.
I still say this is all based on management bonuses (bone-us). By having everyone fly 5 more hrs per month, it reduces the number of bodies required by about 6 for every 100.
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 186
Your last sentence is accurate, but it's the opposite cause and effect. It's not that we're not flying more to reduce the need for bodies, it's that we don't have enough bodies and so we are flying more.
#7
New Hire
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 4
LCW is a sham.
Early on with PBS, you could actually say you wanted to fly the bottom end of the LCW and you would kinda get trips to reflect that. Now it will build you up to the min line value (whatever it is called) and disregard if you want to fly low time. For Nov, I wanted 73 hrs, the bottom of the LCW...PBS built me a month that was 83 hrs and did not award at least a dozen trips because of the min credit thing.
I still say this is all based on management bonuses (bone-us). By having everyone fly 5 more hrs per month, it reduces the number of bodies required by about 6 for every 100.
Early on with PBS, you could actually say you wanted to fly the bottom end of the LCW and you would kinda get trips to reflect that. Now it will build you up to the min line value (whatever it is called) and disregard if you want to fly low time. For Nov, I wanted 73 hrs, the bottom of the LCW...PBS built me a month that was 83 hrs and did not award at least a dozen trips because of the min credit thing.
I still say this is all based on management bonuses (bone-us). By having everyone fly 5 more hrs per month, it reduces the number of bodies required by about 6 for every 100.
You’re not correct.
If everyone wanted to fly high time, the juniors would be forced low (bottom half of the window).
When everyone (seniors) want to fly low, usually to maximize days off, the juniors have to fly in the top half of the LCW.
In either case, the system awards as many guys as possible the low/high time they want. At some point, the system says that from this pilot on, everyone junior has to fly in the top half, or bottom half of the LCW, depending on what the seniors were awarded.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
#9
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 492
Part of the response from my rep:
After PBS went operational, the company failed to reduce the number of pilots on reserve us forcing the remaining pilots flying a line to be scheduled high time lines. This then forces more reserves to fly because the pilots with the line are unable to pick up additional flying. It’s a dog chasing his tail conundrum.
After PBS went operational, the company failed to reduce the number of pilots on reserve us forcing the remaining pilots flying a line to be scheduled high time lines. This then forces more reserves to fly because the pilots with the line are unable to pick up additional flying. It’s a dog chasing his tail conundrum.
#10
New Hire
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 4
Part of the response from my rep:
After PBS went operational, the company failed to reduce the number of pilots on reserve us forcing the remaining pilots flying a line to be scheduled high time lines. This then forces more reserves to fly because the pilots with the line are unable to pick up additional flying. It’s a dog chasing his tail conundrum.
After PBS went operational, the company failed to reduce the number of pilots on reserve us forcing the remaining pilots flying a line to be scheduled high time lines. This then forces more reserves to fly because the pilots with the line are unable to pick up additional flying. It’s a dog chasing his tail conundrum.
THAT I agree with. The min required RV settings should be lower. That will allow lower line averages.
Having said that, my comment about who has to fly in the upper ½ of the range still applies, regardless of where the LCW is set.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cloudseer
Flight Schools and Training
2
07-12-2011 05:51 PM
Cosmik
Flight Schools and Training
9
02-08-2007 07:21 AM