AA Non-Rev travel
#131
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
Speaking of nonrevs on my commute today the mom fell asleep and her kids used cell phones without headphones to play games the whole time. This is the issue with letting literally everyone at the company nonrev with impunity. These were not well dressed people, I know this makes me a dick but they were on the lower end of society.
All I could think about watching them was, man they're gonna be some boy's nightmare someday....very high on the crazy/good looking scale indeed.
#132
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,285
Classy post, Got it.
Must feel good talking down to people that make 1/8th of what you do, with the exact same qualifications.
#133
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 484
I thought I must have misinterpreted his post. Guess not. Yeah I guess some just feel they have it and deserve it, others don’t. Luckily most don’t have such DB outlooks.
#134
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,533
Somebody get the backhoe for TankerDriver...
He needs help digging himself a bigger hole.
The fact of the matter is that all of the employees of this corporation, which includes AAL and the wholly owned Eagle carriers are viewed equally by the corporation when it comes to travel benefits. It’s been this way since since the late 80’s when AMR bought their commuter airlines and brought them in-house.
There is no entitlement when it comes to travel passes here. A new hire Envoy, PSA, or Piedmont FO with his spouse or companion will trump the number 1 pilot at AAL if he checks in sooner. It is what it is, and always will be.
Maybe your wife should’ve listed D1 and ensured she got on the list at the first possible second, Tanker. Regardless, your argument falls on deaf ears.
He needs help digging himself a bigger hole.
The fact of the matter is that all of the employees of this corporation, which includes AAL and the wholly owned Eagle carriers are viewed equally by the corporation when it comes to travel benefits. It’s been this way since since the late 80’s when AMR bought their commuter airlines and brought them in-house.
There is no entitlement when it comes to travel passes here. A new hire Envoy, PSA, or Piedmont FO with his spouse or companion will trump the number 1 pilot at AAL if he checks in sooner. It is what it is, and always will be.
Maybe your wife should’ve listed D1 and ensured she got on the list at the first possible second, Tanker. Regardless, your argument falls on deaf ears.
#135
#137
New Hire
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 4
#139
In a land of unicorns
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,468
Let me guess, their socks smelled too. And weren't of an acceptable fashion brand? I mean, you need Ralph Lauren Purple Label socks to travel non-rev, right?
#140
On Reserve
Joined APC: Feb 2019
Posts: 21
I was really disappointed with AA on our recent trip to MAD. The gate and customer service agents there had to be the rudest individuals I have delt with at this company since working here to the point I contemplate writing an email to the base manager. It was uncalled for and while it was obvious they hate nonrevers there, I witnessed them giving paying customers attitude. I'd like to say they were having a bad day, but we witnessed it two days in a row from the same people, both with us and others. My wife speaks fluent Spanish, so there definitely wasn't a language barrier. The operation there seemed to be dysfuntional and they are short with everyone. Of course as a nonrever I had to shut up and color in fear I wouldn't get a seat assignment, but if I had been on a paid ticket, I would have let one particular agent have it good for his behavior. Anyone else have that experience there?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post