Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
When to take long term Mil leave >

When to take long term Mil leave

Search
Notices

When to take long term Mil leave

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-2019, 11:20 PM
  #21  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 243
Default

Originally Posted by GucciBoy View Post
These are the people protecting you and your family. Take a step back and think about that before you insult their character for “taking” a job from a non-mil pilot. For every Guard/Reserve pilot willing to forego the much better lifestyle of an airline pilot to continue to serve, the retention of their seniority and a military retirement are the least you can do to say thanks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Protecting from what?
Floobs is offline  
Old 10-15-2019, 04:13 AM
  #22  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 271
Default

Retired guard guy here. It is a racket to do indoc and then “poof” disappear for a couple of years to avoid first yr pay/build seniority. Not sure how you can even stop it but its a racket for sure. These guys arr not deploying overseas, they are hanging out at the unit. Once again, stupid conversation because how do you stop it?
AAfng is offline  
Old 10-15-2019, 05:14 AM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Position: 737
Posts: 78
Default

Originally Posted by AAfng View Post
Retired guard guy here. It is a racket to do indoc and then “poof” disappear for a couple of years to avoid first yr pay/build seniority. Not sure how you can even stop it but its a racket for sure. These guys arr not deploying overseas, they are hanging out at the unit. Once again, stupid conversation because how do you stop it?
A fair amount of the Air Force pilots in class openly talked about when to “drop orders”. Reasons ranged from the already stated- not sitting reserve, commuting, or until seniority could hold PHX...

It’s absolutely their right but other pilots are allowed to have an opinion on it.

I’m guessing there are other places to ask this question other than a public forum.
AverageCoffee is offline  
Old 10-15-2019, 06:59 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GucciBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: Fetal
Posts: 1,148
Default

Originally Posted by Floobs View Post
Protecting from what?


A person that would ask this question would logically be in favor of dissolving the military. Are you that person?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GucciBoy is offline  
Old 10-15-2019, 07:17 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,285
Default

Originally Posted by GucciBoy View Post
A person that would ask this question would logically be in favor of dissolving the military. Are you that person?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In most western countries people realize the military has become political enforcement tool, and the USA is probably the poster child.
Varsity is offline  
Old 10-15-2019, 07:33 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GucciBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: Fetal
Posts: 1,148
Default

Originally Posted by Varsity View Post
In most western countries people realize the military has become political enforcement tool, and the USA is probably the poster child.


So you are saying the military offers no protection to the nation and it’s populace? Because when you read your post and the previous post I replied to, that’s what it sounds like you’re saying.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GucciBoy is offline  
Old 10-15-2019, 07:41 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,285
Default

Originally Posted by GucciBoy View Post
So you are saying the military offers no protection to the nation and it’s populace? Because when you read your post and the previous post I replied to, that’s what it sounds like you’re saying.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The protection it offers is grossly disproportionate to it's cost and reverence.

Even suggesting this provokes a heretic level response from most members of the military.
Varsity is offline  
Old 10-15-2019, 08:28 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hindsight2020's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Center seat, doing loops to music
Posts: 825
Default

Originally Posted by AverageCoffee View Post
A fair amount of the Air Force pilots in class openly talked about when to “drop orders”. Reasons ranged from the already stated- not sitting reserve, commuting, or until seniority could hold PHX...

It’s absolutely their right but other pilots are allowed to have an opinion on it.

I’m guessing there are other places to ask this question other than a public forum.
Indeed. Look, basically people are speaking the quiet parts out loud in here, and some are gonna get miffed about it. It's not that surprising, in what is essentially is a MLOA echo chamber.

It's an open secret, it's discussed widely in reserve circles, and I personally have no particular motivation to put effort in ensuring civi only pilots never become aware of the practice. It's a legal loophole plain and simple, and good bad or indifferent, it's the law. But as you said, people should also have the freedom to be critical of it without being accused of lack of patriotism. I'll be the first one to push back on that "you can't be critical of the military as a civilian" canard.

On a personal level, the one thing I have the most objection to is the VA disability payment and rating abuse. This encompasses more than pilots mind you, it's an at-large national problem imo but I digress.

I do think current MLOA benefit retainment allowances is ripe for abuse; it is abused, and it's legal. That's my opinion of course, which doesn't matter. For whatever it's worth, there are other ways of splitting the middle on this issue without throwing the baby out with the bathwater. IMO, if USERRA protected seniority accrual, but did not protect longevity pay accrual, this problem would vanish overnight. I think that would be a reasonable compromise. I can hear the blood curling screech from the MLOA bat caves though. Not my fight, just saying there's other ways to do this without creating polarization. To each their own.
hindsight2020 is offline  
Old 10-15-2019, 08:45 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GucciBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: Fetal
Posts: 1,148
Default

Originally Posted by hindsight2020 View Post
Indeed. Look, basically people are speaking the quiet parts out loud in here, and some are gonna get miffed about it. It's not that surprising, in what is essentially is a MLOA echo chamber.



It's an open secret, it's discussed widely in reserve circles, and I personally have no particular motivation to put effort in ensuring civi only pilots never become aware of the practice. It's a legal loophole plain and simple, and good bad or indifferent, it's the law. But as you said, people should also have the freedom to be critical of it without being accused of lack of patriotism. I'll be the first one to push back on that "you can't be critical of the military as a civilian" canard.



On a personal level, the one thing I have the most objection to is the VA disability payment and rating abuse. This encompasses more than pilots mind you, it's an at-large national problem imo but I digress.



I do think current MLOA benefit retainment allowances is ripe for abuse; it is abused, and it's legal. That's my opinion of course, which doesn't matter. For whatever it's worth, there are other ways of splitting the middle on this issue without throwing the baby out with the bathwater. IMO, if USERRA protected seniority accrual, but did not protect longevity pay accrual, this problem would vanish overnight. I think that would be a reasonable compromise. I can hear the blood curling screech from the MLOA bat caves though. Not my fight, just saying there's other ways to do this without creating polarization. To each their own.


This is how you make an argument, people. I still disagree, but this is infinitely more thought provoking and defensible than “the military doesn’t protect us” and “the military is, like, just a political arm of the government, man.”

A few things: As long as the person on mil leave is performing mil duty in any capacity, there is no “abuse” taking place. And for the vast majority of guard/reserve pilots, taking mil leave is a very bad deal. I take a significant pay cut every time I have to drop mil. So I’m working harder and making less money, and I don’t know of very many people for whom this isn’t the case.

Lastly, even if you think it’s being abused (it’s not), and even if you think it’s unfair (debatable at best), it’s a known quantity to everyone going in. My main point of contention is that no one should be criticizing someone for exercising a right that is known to everyone. You can criticize the policy, but don’t blame someone when they utilize it, especially when that person has made personal sacrifices for the good of their fellow citizens. You know, don’t hate the player and all that.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GucciBoy is offline  
Old 10-15-2019, 09:07 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,092
Default

If the company had a problem with it then they would tweak their hiring metrics to maybe not hire as many mil or reserve guys. You know they know, they know you know they know, etc.

In other words, it's really not something to get upset about IMO. It's a harmless practice and if China were to launch a ground attack on Taiwan or Hong Kong tomorrow, guess who is going over there? Not me...I'll be at home on my sofa.
Name User is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Han Solo
Money Talk
1
10-20-2018 07:09 AM
ewrfo
United
7
01-15-2018 05:12 PM
dotsero
Career Questions
5
10-21-2016 06:21 PM
veez737
Cargo
28
02-22-2010 08:45 AM
A320fumes
Major
11
12-28-2009 04:07 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices