Originally Posted by Gilligan13
(Post 3090066)
Is this the end of the 777 in LAX?
Probably, my bet is we’re out of the 777 entirely in 3 years. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
United reversed the decision to close the 777/787 base in LAX following Americans decision to pull out of so much international flying. United sees an opportunity. Just a few weeks after Vasu’s interview where he claimed to be excited about gaining market share on the backend of the Pandemic. Instead AA will have completely lost the west coast. With the exception of three flights out of Seattle and a trickle out of LA. Disappointing.
|
Originally Posted by bababouey
(Post 3090288)
Probably, my bet is we’re out of the 777 entirely in 3 years.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Did they give the 777 another city since it’s pulled HKG? Or is it just going to be going to London?
|
Originally Posted by AAL24
(Post 3090372)
United reversed the decision to close the 777/787 base in LAX following Americans decision to pull out of so much international flying. United sees an opportunity. Just a few weeks after Vasu’s interview where he claimed to be excited about gaining market share on the backend of the Pandemic. Instead AA will have completely lost the west coast. With the exception of three flights out of Seattle and a trickle out of LA. Disappointing.
United made that decision a few weeks before we made our intl cuts announcement. United is keeping that position open at LAX to support the cargo operation. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Gilligan13
(Post 3090463)
Did they give the 777 another city since it’s pulled HKG? Or is it just going to be going to London?
|
Originally Posted by AAL24
(Post 3090372)
United reversed the decision to close the 777/787 base in LAX following Americans decision to pull out of so much international flying. United sees an opportunity. Just a few weeks after Vasu’s interview where he claimed to be excited about gaining market share on the backend of the Pandemic. Instead AA will have completely lost the west coast. With the exception of three flights out of Seattle and a trickle out of LA. Disappointing.
|
Originally Posted by C11DCA
(Post 3092888)
United wants to resume LAX-SYD. The only way they can fly it is with a LAX based crew since it is an FRMS route. Hence, not closing the 787 base there as was announced just a few months ago.
|
Originally Posted by Systemized
(Post 3093012)
Will SEA-BLR be a FRMS route requiring a SEA crew base (500 NM longer than LAX-SYD)?
FRMS is not just about the distance/ block time but about the associated risks involved to that specific route and builds in mitigating factors. Currently the FRMS routes for United are California-SYD, California-SIN, California-MEL, IAH-SYD, SFO-DEL, EWR-CPT. EWR-BOM, GUM-IHOP. |
Originally Posted by C11DCA
(Post 3093388)
I have no idea if American will apply for it to be one. I’m a United guy.
FRMS is not just about the distance/ block time but about the associated risks involved to that specific route and builds in mitigating factors. Currently the FRMS routes for United are California-SYD, California-SIN, California-MEL, IAH-SYD, SFO-DEL, EWR-CPT. EWR-BOM, GUM-IHOP. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:46 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands