TTS 2.0 feedback
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 428
This is the problem with having 15,000 pilots. A super vocal group made it clear that they don't ever want to be reassigned off their trip and they don't want RO. So the APA focused on that in negotiations. Meanwhile they didn't ask for **** with regards to sequence construction (ie, even split of 1,2,3,4 day trips and a smattering of 5 day trips) and they didn't ask for anything about trip trading and minimum green trips to drop. Super frustrating. While I see the importance of fixing RA's and RO, I find the latter set of problems far more important.
#22
I agree, it should be all of those get fixed, but that’s not what was proposed. I’m all for ALPA here.
#23
That said, the more people that post their trips the better chances everyone has of trading trips. I've been able to swap out of a decent amount, got rid of all my red eyes, and more seems to be available in my "N4TL".
#24
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Nov 2018
Posts: 97
APA info
"....today, the Board approved a motion directing the Negotiating Committee to engage with management to remove the real time trade flag requirement (JCBA 15.P.3.a., seniority in turn) for trips that are placed into TTS RTT, while keeping the batch runs in place to facilitate multi-pilot trades."'
#25
"....today, the Board approved a motion directing the Negotiating Committee to engage with management to remove the real time trade flag requirement (JCBA 15.P.3.a., seniority in turn) for trips that are placed into TTS RTT, while keeping the batch runs in place to facilitate multi-pilot trades."'
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 634
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post