![]() |
AA Recalls, Hiring and Retirements
So AMR is claiming a shortage of pilots "due to sick calls and retirements" resulting in the reduction of flight schedules. What is the prospect of hiring? Are furloughees actively returning or even being called back?
Not much AMR news among all the DL and UA stuff. |
Everything is on hold now pending the judge's decision on Friday along with the company's "best and final" offer being considered by the APA BOD.
Yes the company is extremely short on pilots on most fleets and 100+ retirements on 7/1 won't help matters. If anything it will reduce or maybe even nullify any possible furloughs planned for the inevitable increase in hours we'll be working under the new contract. |
Originally Posted by Airway
(Post 1215448)
So AMR is claiming a shortage of pilots "due to sick calls and retirements" resulting in the reduction of flight schedules. What is the prospect of hiring? Are furloughees actively returning or even being called back?
Not much AMR news among all the DL and UA stuff. |
Good chance those "seniority numbers" won't hold with the US/APA Term sheet. It mentions that in there. Don't hold your breath...
|
Originally Posted by GAPILOT36
(Post 1215558)
Good chance those "seniority numbers" won't hold with the US/APA Term sheet. It mentions that in there. Don't hold your breath...
|
Originally Posted by aa73
(Post 1215449)
Everything is on hold now pending the judge's decision on Friday along with the company's "best and final" offer being considered by the APA BOD.
Yes the company is extremely short on pilots on most fleets and 100+ retirements on 7/1 won't help matters. If anything it will reduce or maybe even nullify any possible furloughs planned for the inevitable increase in hours we'll be working under the new contract. |
It's a reasonable guess based on the # of lock-ins for 7/1, along with the fact that the B fund look-back will go away with the judge's ruling (if he rules this Friday.) We do have a pilot who runs an investment business on the side who has accurately predicted every retirement month so far, according to him we should be between 100 and 200 possible retirements on 7/1.
|
He said "closer to 100" recently.
Stock market recovering from it's recent lows might be the change? |
APA board about to vote whether to send "last/best" offer to membership, within the hour....
|
APA BOD rejected the final offer by 11-5. Apparently it was a turd (shocker.) So it will not be presented to the membership, and Judge Lane will rule this Friday.
Game On! |
Would imagine there will be a few empty flight decks on Friday. The term FUPM comes to mind.
|
Official statement commented about lack of details in specific areas and concerns about contract langauge.
Judges have granted additional time in the past. We'll know by Happy Hour on Friday. |
Originally Posted by aa73
(Post 1215749)
APA BOD rejected the final offer by 11-5. Apparently it was a turd (shocker.) So it will not be presented to the membership, and Judge Lane will rule this Friday.
Game On! |
Originally Posted by Wingtips
(Post 1215894)
I project an 11th hour deal, will Horton really gamble on it, if he gambles wrong a USAIR deal might become an instant deal. A. pilot go out to lunch and 40% of all flight cx for weeks. B. this enters another 4+ months of talks because the judge tells them to get a new 1113, which means nothing new happens at AA, or Eagle.
What's the point of sugaring it up now, only to have it fail once again in a month ? Truly a poorly played, ugly mess this is. The irony is that if Horton hadn't put Brundage out front, hired Lorenzo's old player and didn't go for the jugular, we may have been in a completely different place now. Almost certainly, CLA's with Parker wouldn't be in place and that would be a totally different equation. |
Originally Posted by Sliceback
(Post 1215641)
He said "closer to 100" recently.
Stock market recovering from it's recent lows might be the change? |
New pension regulation yesterday would allow AA to freeze the plan and end the lump sum provision in certain cases. 60 day comment period prior to implementation, so I'd expect many retirements in the next 2 mos.
|
Originally Posted by swaayze
(Post 1216233)
New pension regulation yesterday would allow AA to freeze the plan and end the lump sum provision in certain cases. 60 day comment period prior to implementation, so I'd expect many retirements in the next 2 mos.
Look the A-fund will be frozen versus terminated. Why would anyone rush to the exit? The B-fund still has a lump sum feature and even if we move to the new DC plan, it's in the 401K plan and you can take it all upon retirement. Why would anyone rush to the exit? Both the company and US have proposed pay raises plus the company (AA) has up the ante with a 13.5 percent equity stake in the emerged AA. Why would anyone rush to the exit? The senior guys will remain senior no matter who eventually lead the company. This is all wishful thinking to believe we'll see a mad rush for the exits. I do believe the senior captains over 60 will make an informed decision about whether they keep working or have decided its time to relax. But there won't be any sudden run on the bank here. |
Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
(Post 1216314)
I don't know where you guys come up with this stuff!
Look the A-fund will be frozen versus terminated. Why would anyone rush to the exit? The B-fund still has a lump sum feature and even if we move to the new DC plan, it's in the 401K plan and you can take it all upon retirement. Why would anyone rush to the exit? Both the company and US have proposed pay raises plus the company (AA) has up the ante with a 13.5 percent equity stake in the emerged AA. Why would anyone rush to the exit? The senior guys will remain senior no matter who eventually lead the company. This is all wishful thinking to believe we'll see a mad rush for the exits. I do believe the senior captains over 60 will make an informed decision about whether they keep working or have decided its time to relax. But there won't be any sudden run on the bank here. However, a forced 1113 will likely raise that to the 120-150 range due to exhaustion, disgust and uncertainty for more senior. Your claims COMPLETELY leave out the truth, which tell me either you're clueless about this issue and its associated factors (as a paid shill who nodded off during the pension briefing might be) or you're locked in "spin mode". "Mad rush" ? No. "Significant retirements", especially considering tsummer schedule, staffing issues and those actually turning 65 ? Yes. BTW, why do you think Lane granted only 1 week for futher negotiations and not 2 ? Is one reason perhaps because AMR is hoping for an APA supported TA by the middle of next week that might calm more who are on the fence from bailing 7/1 ? I do. ;) They may still have a day or two to decide not to pull the ripcord. The 767/777 schedule could be a real mess in July/August if a lot bail from those seats by all those combined factors and any imposed 1113 benefits take time to kick in. A bat to the head of 767/777 crews won't be that productive, if you ask me. |
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 1216357)
58 left 6/1, all of them early retirements and that's a lot (that would be 700/year in one where only a handful turn 65). The estimate a few weeks ago for 7/1 was 100-200. I thought it would be closer to 100. Recently a source who has been consistantly accurate forcasted that downward to just under 100 (still approaching double that of June). The primary reason for this is the look back lock-in provisions for the B-fund and taking advantage of the 90-day March value which was the peak (April being slightly lower).
However, a forced 1113 will likely raise that to the 120-150 range due to exhaustion, disgust and uncertainty for more senior. Your claims COMPLETELY leave out the truth, which tell me either you're clueless about this issue and its associated factors (as a paid shill who nodded off during the pension briefing might be) or you're locked in "spin mode". "Mad rush" ? No. "Significant retirements", especially considering tsummer schedule, staffing issues and those actually turning 65 ? Yes. BTW, why do you think Lane granted only 1 week for futher negotiations and not 2 ? Is one reason perhaps because AMR is hoping for an APA supported TA by the middle of next week that might calm more who are on the fence from bailing 7/1 ? I do. ;) They may still have a day or two to decide not to pull the ripcord. The 767/777 schedule could be a real mess in July/August if a lot bail from those seats by all those combined factors and any imposed 1113 benefits take time to kick in. A bat to the head of 767/777 crews won't be that productive, if you ask me. Thinking is a choice! You tend toward the negative and I lean toward the positive. Both are needed at times. The trick, I'm sure you'll agree, is getting the balance right. Best :) |
Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
(Post 1216369)
No shortage of conspiracy thinking here. I believe it was actually a mutually agreed to decision with AA, the APA leadership and Judge Lane.
Thinking is a choice! You tend toward the negative and I lean toward the positive. Both are needed at times. The trick, I'm sure you'll agree, is getting the balance right. Best :) A warm and fuzzy kitten, you are ! |
Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
(Post 1216314)
I don't know where you guys come up with this stuff!
Look the A-fund will be frozen versus terminated. Why would anyone rush to the exit? Maybe you're right, as my thoughts were based only on initial impulse after scanning the article quickly, but I'd bet there are many who thought about going out in Nov who'd like a do-over and don't intend to miss a better deal again. Fool me once..... Edit: Ah I see what I forgot, no lump sum available right now anyway. I still think some on the fence will "just be done with it" and pull the plug if/when negative details come to light. |
I'm sure guys will stick around to see what's available (equity $$) upon emergence. Once the $$ is in the bank, they'll bail due to the $hitty contract.
|
Originally Posted by Ball Breaker
(Post 1217470)
I'm sure guys will stick around to see what's available (equity $$) upon emergence. Once the $$ is in the bank, they'll bail due to the $hitty contract.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:37 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands