Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
Judge says AMR can toss pilot contract >

Judge says AMR can toss pilot contract

Search
Notices

Judge says AMR can toss pilot contract

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2012, 09:05 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: forever fo
Posts: 2,413
Default

Originally Posted by HSLD View Post
Except for the 100 737-Max, 50 737-900ER recently announced. Oh yeah, the UAL pre-merger 25 787 and 25 A350 order (with options for 25 more of each). Plus all the pre-merger CAL jets on order.
Aside from that, UAL has no aircraft on order.
And if no JCBA is worked out, how many are at LUAL??? I bet the guys on the LCAL will be enjoy them, while the LUAL guys feel like its Eastern all over.

Please tell me how many of those are slated to be at UNITED LEGACY SIDE if no one list, one contract is worked out???

This is why I put (Legacy UAL) in the post.
lakehouse is offline  
Old 09-04-2012, 09:13 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: forever fo
Posts: 2,413
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly View Post
AFAIK, only the East side is slated for a large number of retirements at U and that will still take years. I don't see mass parking of the -80's anytime soon as that would result in a massive and permanent loss of revenue. It seems you've got AA with no furloughs and theoretically little attrition parking all the -80's and all the new orders going elsewhere..........well, I suppose Parker could staff the AA side at 500% on reserves. The failed TA provided for the outsourcing of the junior half of the pilots jobs anyway, so even in your draconian scenario, Parker wouldn't be any worse then that term sheet and as stated, the CLA throws a lot of wrenches in that plan.

Rick, this whole dance isn't going to go on for more then a few months at most (personally, I can't see it getting too far into the holiday travel season). The UCC cannot.........no, WILL not (by their own admission) sign on to AA exiting BK without a pilots CBA and that will either happen one of 2 ways. Either A. AMR and the APA negotiate something palatable to the pilot GROUP and that will have to be BETTER then U's CLA for the price of tolerating this management any further -or- B. a merger will be consummated within C11 and that triggers the U CLA, which may occur as a result of AMR's faliure to come to a consenual deal and the UCC acts to terminate exclusivity or perhaps before any deal as a result of AMR's acceptance of US Airways's submitting a POR to the court.

The judge has now given AMR a bigger bat to hit us with, but the faster and harder they swing it at our heads, the more determined we'll be to take the whacks until the UCC says time has run out and takes the bat away. That's my take on it anyway. AMR has stated they intend to impliment most of the 1113 provisions and has threatened to eliminate any pension including 401(k) contributions as a punitive measure, but we shall see. At any rate, in the very near term look for the following;

- Pay rate adjustments per the 1113.
- No sequence protection or minimum guarantee.
- 1113 adjustments to RSV system and reduction of pay credits.
- Loss of all E,F,G time and Int'l override.
- Loss of pay protection for fatigue.
- Changes to sick leave policy, including reduced compensation and requirement for 3rd party approval of illness.
- Airport fleabag hotels with no APA input.
- LTD adjustments for the negative.
- Implimenting scope changes.
- Closing of domiciles with STL, BOS and DCA the top contenders for elimination/reduction.
- Possible furloughs.
- Freezing of the A-fund and termination of the B-fund (again possibly replaced with NOTHING, if the threat is acted upon).

PBS will take 6 to as long as 18 months to impliment, I've heard. Medical plans will be changed for 2013 and those are normally selected during October, so that would take effect for 2013 (it's my understanding medical benefits cannot be changed mid-term), so those two seem more longer term changes.
I hope your right, I just have a hard time seeing any good coming from a USAIR merger. Outside of the worthlessness I see of USAIR in general, I see WAY too much room for elimination. This isnt DELTA/NWA, its not even UAL/CAL. ITs a scary amount of worthless units, almost like a TWA/Airtran.
lakehouse is offline  
Old 09-04-2012, 09:40 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KillingMeSmalls's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 228
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly View Post
AFAIK, only the East side is slated for a large number of retirements at U and that will still take years. I don't see mass parking of the -80's anytime soon as that would result in a massive and permanent loss of revenue. It seems you've got AA with no furloughs and theoretically little attrition parking all the -80's and all the new orders going elsewhere..........well, I suppose Parker could staff the AA side at 500% on reserves. The failed TA provided for the outsourcing of the junior half of the pilots jobs anyway, so even in your draconian scenario, Parker wouldn't be any worse then that term sheet and as stated, the CLA throws a lot of wrenches in that plan.

Rick, this whole dance isn't going to go on for more then a few months at most (personally, I can't see it getting too far into the holiday travel season). The UCC cannot.........no, WILL not (by their own admission) sign on to AA exiting BK without a pilots CBA and that will either happen one of 2 ways. Either A. AMR and the APA negotiate something palatable to the pilot GROUP and that will have to be BETTER then U's CLA for the price of tolerating this management any further -or- B. a merger will be consummated within C11 and that triggers the U CLA, which may occur as a result of AMR's faliure to come to a consenual deal and the UCC acts to terminate exclusivity or perhaps before any deal as a result of AMR's acceptance of US Airways's submitting a POR to the court.

The judge has now given AMR a bigger bat to hit us with, but the faster and harder they swing it at our heads, the more determined we'll be to take the whacks until the UCC says time has run out and takes the bat away. That's my take on it anyway. AMR has stated they intend to impliment most of the 1113 provisions and has threatened to eliminate any pension including 401(k) contributions as a punitive measure, but we shall see. At any rate, in the very near term look for the following;

- Pay rate adjustments per the 1113.
- No sequence protection or minimum guarantee.
- 1113 adjustments to RSV system and reduction of pay credits.
- Loss of all E,F,G time and Int'l override.
- Loss of pay protection for fatigue.
- Changes to sick leave policy, including reduced compensation and requirement for 3rd party approval of illness.
- Airport fleabag hotels with no APA input.
- LTD adjustments for the negative.
- Implimenting scope changes.
- Closing of domiciles with STL, BOS and DCA the top contenders for elimination/reduction.
- Possible furloughs.
- Freezing of the A-fund and termination of the B-fund (again possibly replaced with NOTHING, if the threat is acted upon).

PBS will take 6 to as long as 18 months to impliment, I've heard. Medical plans will be changed for 2013 and those are normally selected during October, so that would take effect for 2013 (it's my understanding medical benefits cannot be changed mid-term), so those two seem more longer term changes.
As always, a good assessment eaglefly. AFAIK is just throwing out some flamebait. I wish guys like that would just stick to their regional threads, because I am now dumber for reading his posts.
KillingMeSmalls is offline  
Old 09-04-2012, 11:34 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 400
Default

Originally Posted by HSLD View Post
Except for the 100 737-Max, 50 737-900ER recently announced. Oh yeah, the UAL pre-merger 25 787 and 25 A350 order (with options for 25 more of each). Plus all the pre-merger CAL jets on order.
Aside from that, UAL has no aircraft on order.
Many missed the 160 more options UCH got on Max 9s and ERs for the 787 delays. They also make no mention of the Airbus revamp planned to run those till 2020. This is not a shrinking airline just one moving the pieces around for efficiency.
dvhighdrive88 is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 01:15 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: AB 320 Captain
Posts: 355
Default

Doug Parker has a flight attendant fan club. I don't agree with all the view points, the pictures are worth a look.
FIREDOUGPARKER.ORG
CaptainBigWood is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 03:31 AM
  #16  
Fore!
 
Tony Nelson's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 756 F/O
Posts: 505
Default

Originally Posted by rickt86 View Post
And if no JCBA is worked out, how many are at LUAL??? I bet the guys on the LCAL will be enjoy them, while the LUAL guys feel like its Eastern all over.

Please tell me how many of those are slated to be at UNITED LEGACY SIDE if no one list, one contract is worked out???

This is why I put (Legacy UAL) in the post.
The -900ER's (50 firm, 60 option) are planned to replace about 85 L-UAL 757-200's.
Tony Nelson is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 03:38 AM
  #17  
Not A Janitor
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 814
Default

Originally Posted by Tony Nelson View Post
The -900ER's (50 firm, 60 option) are planned to replace about 85 L-UAL 757-200's.
Exactly. Nothing to be jumping for joy about.
atrdriver is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 04:15 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,260
Default

Originally Posted by rickt86 View Post
Well the upcoming retirements can offset any need to furlough at U. However AA is prime picking off the bat, its why I dont get why you guys want it so bad. Park all the MD80s right off the bat, and start picking and choosing which parts of the upcoming airplane orders he REALLY wants. The scary part starts coming when retirements happen, and new airplane orders happen, one place could get all the planes while the other sit in a pile of their own stagnation for a decade. That is starting to become the scary thought at United right now (legacy UAL), no airplanes on order, and a JCBA held so far over their head they feel like a small child jumping up trying to get a toy. Just trying to throw it out there that the USAIR deal might be a terrible alternative. Well, unless you block AMR from getting any bonuses from this Ch11 process and force a USAIR takeover, then at least you get the joy of blocking millions to Horton and CO, but at the expense of being at the mercy of Parker, and giving him whatever bonuses he gets.

I guess the big problem is corporate America is the new Mafia, ripping people off. Your picking Tony Soprano to save you from Johnny Sacks.
I think I check on the UAL aircraft order thing. Your wrong, really wrong.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 04:52 AM
  #19  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by KillingMeSmalls View Post
As always, a good assessment eaglefly. AFAIK is just throwing out some flamebait. I wish guys like that would just stick to their regional threads, because I am now dumber for reading his posts.
"AFAIK" stands for "as far as I know", so I assume you're referring to rick86. There will be streamlining of equipment, routes and hubs as part of any AA/U merger, just like will occur without it, but the combined carrier doesn't have to shrink much to remain about the sizes of UAL or DAL. Those mergers so far haven't produced mass shrinkage/layoffs.

I think the crux of ricks beliefs are more wishful thinking a U hook-up can be avoided as he believes that scenario will be far worse for Eagle then a stand-alone AA. In that respect, he's almost certainly right. AA/U will almost certainly happen IMO, it's just a matter of in or out of BK and whether AMR management or Parkers team is in the drivers seat. That question depends on AMR and whether they can offer the pilots any incentive to support them vs. digging in like ticks until the UCC simply HAS to make a move to complete the process with Parker or Horton acquiesces and supports a POR by Parker triggering the U CLA.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 04:58 AM
  #20  
Fore!
 
Tony Nelson's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 756 F/O
Posts: 505
Default

Originally Posted by atrdriver View Post
Exactly. Nothing to be jumping for joy about.
You are correct, and I'm not jumping for joy. Just passing the latest management plan.
Tony Nelson is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
maximilian2
Foreign
26
06-12-2015 04:31 AM
CAL73CAPT
United
18
01-16-2011 07:46 AM
AAflyer
Major
4
07-17-2008 05:12 AM
Herc130AV8R
Military
25
03-22-2008 05:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices