Union members to vote on American deal
#12
Banned
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,857
Hopefully the "NO" voters listened to the telecon yesterday.
A rejected TA puts the merger And Equity Stake at a huge risk
Furlough protection to last active FO
Scope and Code share agreements defended and explained well
I have mouths to feed and a mortgage to pay, I think turning this TA down
would be a huge mistake, I am a YES
A rejected TA puts the merger And Equity Stake at a huge risk
Furlough protection to last active FO
Scope and Code share agreements defended and explained well
I have mouths to feed and a mortgage to pay, I think turning this TA down
would be a huge mistake, I am a YES
#13
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Hopefully the "NO" voters listened to the telecon yesterday.
A rejected TA puts the merger And Equity Stake at a huge risk
Furlough protection to last active FO
Scope and Code share agreements defended and explained well
I have mouths to feed and a mortgage to pay, I think turning this TA down
would be a huge mistake, I am a YES
A rejected TA puts the merger And Equity Stake at a huge risk
Furlough protection to last active FO
Scope and Code share agreements defended and explained well
I have mouths to feed and a mortgage to pay, I think turning this TA down
would be a huge mistake, I am a YES
Oh....and did I say I'm voting no ?
I am.
#14
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Sad, but predictable.
Airlinii Pilotus is always predictable.
#16
I heard enough of the town hall conference to vote no. It's just another spin from the same spinmeisters concerned with their temporary chunk of change like you. In fact, it's virtually the same deal as before with a sprinkle of sugar, but not on anything important. At least they confirmed Eagle can get Airbuses under this deal and I expect they will. I'll laugh at the dopes who voted yes, when they do.
Oh....and did I say I'm voting no ?
I am.
Oh....and did I say I'm voting no ?
I am.
Lower limit on seats and weights for regional feed aircraft
–76 seats, 86,000 lb. limit matches agreements at Delta and United
"I want to make clear that this is not a fantasy game of Dungeons and Dragons or Call of Duty. We are not on a fictional crusade to slay a mythical dragon or gun down the opposition. This is not a remake of “Braveheart.” This is our future, and it is imperative that you understand that we currently hold that future in our hands."
#17
I belive when most people refer to Eagle operating Airbuses and other aircraft of that size they are refering to the Executive certificate. In the late 90's AMR combined all their feeders into American Eagle holdings and under that holding company they kept two out of four certificate. Simmons now known as American Eagle Airlines (currently operating jets) and Executive Airlines this is where the ATRs are assigned to. All of the ATRs are scheduled to be returned by 1st qt 2013. The executive certificate is worth a lot of money do to its capabilities, that certificate is approved for over water opearations, GPS and most importantly international. That certificate can operate from North American all the way to South America and anywhere in between. People are concerned about this because if American spins off Eagle to the shareholders then American Eagle Holdings will no longer be controlled or control AMR, the American Eagle certificate can be a feeder for American Airlines but Executive Airlines could get larger airplanes and be a new code share partner with a certificate that is more capable than any if the LCC outhere to include Southwest (I am only refering to what the certificate is certified for). This is what I belive people refer to as Eagle getting Airbuses and if not people need to pay attention because we this is a very realist scenario if management was going to do it.
#18
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
What is exactly correct. The majority of senior pilots either think this wont happen or really don't care. Most of the junior pilots do. In APA's recent teleconference they admitted this possibility, but are so terrified of the BK process to fight it. It is even described in the TA scope language as the "New Entrant Carrier".
It's been AMR's goal to turn AA into a smaller International and long-range domestic carrier and it sounds like its about to happen. I think Eagle and others will take over a lot of the current domestic.
It's been AMR's goal to turn AA into a smaller International and long-range domestic carrier and it sounds like its about to happen. I think Eagle and others will take over a lot of the current domestic.
#20
Dec. 7 I'm a NO!
On our message board many are calling No voters "emotional" again.
I just cannot give that much on Scope.
AMR and the media portray this as a 4% raise, 2% raise the next year, 2% raise the next year then industry standard the 4th year of this 6 year deal.
So that NEVER NEVER NEVER could we AA pilots raise the bar like DAL UAL and SWA (UAL + 3% or DAL + 3%). Yet the loss of night pay, the loss of Int'l override pay on reserve (if you don't fly on reserve you don't get int'l override pay of CA $6 hr and FO $4.00 hr) For me becomes a small pay cut.
If this passes even though i'm voting NO, I would have to apologize for AA pilots never able to raise the bar for our fellow aviators(trix's) at the other majors.
We have never raised the bar in my career. For that i'm truly sorry.
I have lots of fight in me! I will fight.
Thanks you to the pilots of United Airlines and the pilots of Delta Airlines for standing firm and raising the bar. I regret that my compatriots at AA seem to not want to fight for what is rightfully all of our profession.
This contract would if passed with it's subjective words, would allow only a ISC never an ILC for the next decade.
7576FO
On our message board many are calling No voters "emotional" again.
I just cannot give that much on Scope.
AMR and the media portray this as a 4% raise, 2% raise the next year, 2% raise the next year then industry standard the 4th year of this 6 year deal.
So that NEVER NEVER NEVER could we AA pilots raise the bar like DAL UAL and SWA (UAL + 3% or DAL + 3%). Yet the loss of night pay, the loss of Int'l override pay on reserve (if you don't fly on reserve you don't get int'l override pay of CA $6 hr and FO $4.00 hr) For me becomes a small pay cut.
If this passes even though i'm voting NO, I would have to apologize for AA pilots never able to raise the bar for our fellow aviators(trix's) at the other majors.
We have never raised the bar in my career. For that i'm truly sorry.
I have lots of fight in me! I will fight.
Thanks you to the pilots of United Airlines and the pilots of Delta Airlines for standing firm and raising the bar. I regret that my compatriots at AA seem to not want to fight for what is rightfully all of our profession.
This contract would if passed with it's subjective words, would allow only a ISC never an ILC for the next decade.
7576FO
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post