Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
Union members to vote on American deal >

Union members to vote on American deal

Notices

Union members to vote on American deal

Old 11-20-2012, 07:52 AM
  #11  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: CR7 Capt.
Posts: 88
Default

This thread is mislabeled: should be American pilots vote NO again. Because h3ll no isn't on the ballot.
j1b3h0 is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 11:14 AM
  #12  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,857
Default

Hopefully the "NO" voters listened to the telecon yesterday.
A rejected TA puts the merger And Equity Stake at a huge risk
Furlough protection to last active FO
Scope and Code share agreements defended and explained well

I have mouths to feed and a mortgage to pay, I think turning this TA down
would be a huge mistake, I am a YES
Stop the effing world, we have got ourself a pilot with kids and a mortgage.
Sailor is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 12:07 PM
  #13  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by kcpunk View Post
Hopefully the "NO" voters listened to the telecon yesterday.
A rejected TA puts the merger And Equity Stake at a huge risk
Furlough protection to last active FO
Scope and Code share agreements defended and explained well

I have mouths to feed and a mortgage to pay, I think turning this TA down
would be a huge mistake, I am a YES
I heard enough of the town hall conference to vote no. It's just another spin from the same spinmeisters concerned with their temporary chunk of change like you. In fact, it's virtually the same deal as before with a sprinkle of sugar, but not on anything important. At least they confirmed Eagle can get Airbuses under this deal and I expect they will. I'll laugh at the dopes who voted yes, when they do.

Oh....and did I say I'm voting no ?

I am.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 12:11 PM
  #14  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by j1b3h0 View Post
This thread is mislabeled: should be American pilots vote NO again. Because h3ll no isn't on the ballot.
Everyone who voted yes for the first turd will vote for this one with peanuts. APA is counting on swaying enough of those who didn't to get just over 50%. Appears most yes voters are more senior and couldn't care less about scope as long as they get theirs. Most of ORD will vote for it and virtually ALL of DFW.

Sad, but predictable.

Airlinii Pilotus is always predictable.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 01:00 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
D B Cooper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Posts: 739
Default

What is it about DFW and ORD? I heard the same at Eagle 99% no in NYC and LAX and 99% yes in DFW and ORD. Same company right?
D B Cooper is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 05:10 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,410
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly View Post
I heard enough of the town hall conference to vote no. It's just another spin from the same spinmeisters concerned with their temporary chunk of change like you. In fact, it's virtually the same deal as before with a sprinkle of sugar, but not on anything important. At least they confirmed Eagle can get Airbuses under this deal and I expect they will. I'll laugh at the dopes who voted yes, when they do.

Oh....and did I say I'm voting no ?

I am.
Airbuses at Eagle how?

Lower limit on seats and weights for regional feed aircraft
–76 seats, 86,000 lb. limit matches agreements at Delta and United


"I want to make clear that this is not a fantasy game of Dungeons and Dragons or Call of Duty. We are not on a fictional crusade to slay a mythical dragon or gun down the opposition. This is not a remake of “Braveheart.” This is our future, and it is imperative that you understand that we currently hold that future in our hands."
Trip7 is offline  
Old 11-21-2012, 03:50 AM
  #17  
Underpaid...
 
What's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: French-Canadian
Posts: 2,101
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7 View Post
Airbuses at Eagle how?

Lower limit on seats and weights for regional feed aircraft
–76 seats, 86,000 lb. limit matches agreements at Delta and United."
I belive when most people refer to Eagle operating Airbuses and other aircraft of that size they are refering to the Executive certificate. In the late 90's AMR combined all their feeders into American Eagle holdings and under that holding company they kept two out of four certificate. Simmons now known as American Eagle Airlines (currently operating jets) and Executive Airlines this is where the ATRs are assigned to. All of the ATRs are scheduled to be returned by 1st qt 2013. The executive certificate is worth a lot of money do to its capabilities, that certificate is approved for over water opearations, GPS and most importantly international. That certificate can operate from North American all the way to South America and anywhere in between. People are concerned about this because if American spins off Eagle to the shareholders then American Eagle Holdings will no longer be controlled or control AMR, the American Eagle certificate can be a feeder for American Airlines but Executive Airlines could get larger airplanes and be a new code share partner with a certificate that is more capable than any if the LCC outhere to include Southwest (I am only refering to what the certificate is certified for). This is what I belive people refer to as Eagle getting Airbuses and if not people need to pay attention because we this is a very realist scenario if management was going to do it.
What is offline  
Old 11-21-2012, 04:57 AM
  #18  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

What is exactly correct. The majority of senior pilots either think this wont happen or really don't care. Most of the junior pilots do. In APA's recent teleconference they admitted this possibility, but are so terrified of the BK process to fight it. It is even described in the TA scope language as the "New Entrant Carrier".

It's been AMR's goal to turn AA into a smaller International and long-range domestic carrier and it sounds like its about to happen. I think Eagle and others will take over a lot of the current domestic.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 11-21-2012, 05:37 AM
  #19  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

When's the vote?
tsquare is offline  
Old 11-21-2012, 10:43 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
7576FO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: 737 CA MIA
Posts: 1,042
Default

Dec. 7 I'm a NO!

On our message board many are calling No voters "emotional" again.

I just cannot give that much on Scope.

AMR and the media portray this as a 4% raise, 2% raise the next year, 2% raise the next year then industry standard the 4th year of this 6 year deal.
So that NEVER NEVER NEVER could we AA pilots raise the bar like DAL UAL and SWA (UAL + 3% or DAL + 3%). Yet the loss of night pay, the loss of Int'l override pay on reserve (if you don't fly on reserve you don't get int'l override pay of CA $6 hr and FO $4.00 hr) For me becomes a small pay cut.

If this passes even though i'm voting NO, I would have to apologize for AA pilots never able to raise the bar for our fellow aviators(trix's) at the other majors.

We have never raised the bar in my career. For that i'm truly sorry.

I have lots of fight in me! I will fight.

Thanks you to the pilots of United Airlines and the pilots of Delta Airlines for standing firm and raising the bar. I regret that my compatriots at AA seem to not want to fight for what is rightfully all of our profession.

This contract would if passed with it's subjective words, would allow only a ISC never an ILC for the next decade.

7576FO
7576FO is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bgmann
Regional
31
11-19-2011 07:33 PM
FlyingViking
Union Talk
7
09-14-2011 08:29 AM
skippy
Cargo
1
04-18-2009 05:56 AM
AviatorPop
Hangar Talk
2
07-03-2008 02:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices