Notices

Current State of USAPA

Old 02-01-2014, 05:05 PM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 52
Default Current State of USAPA

Another take on the state of the East dominate union, USAPA>

USAPAWATCH: "Outmaneuvered"
USAPAWATCH.COM published a new post entitled "Outmaneuvered" on 2/1/2014 2:40:18 PM, written by TheEye.
Outmaneuvered

It has been a while since TheEye has blogged, but we couldn’t resist commenting on the denouement of the USAPA saga.

We encourage all US Airways and American pilots to read Judge Silver’s final Order. Contrary to what Hummel and the BPR is spouting off to the east membership, it's clear that Judge Silver completely neutered USAPA. Her ruling effectively ended USAPA’s participation in the upcoming seniority list integration with American. If this reality hasn’t sunk in yet, we suggest you actually read Judge Silver’s Order. You will read that USAPA waived their right to participate in the McCaskill-Bond process with the ratification of the MOU which requires the Allied Pilots Association (APA) to file for single carrier status within four months of the merger.

Silver stated :

“As contemplated by the MOU, in the very near future an election will take place and a new representative will be chosen by all the post-merger pilots. It is almost certain USAPA will lose that election. Once that happens, USAPA will no longer be entitled to participate in the seniority integration.”

With this in mind, it's laughable that the USAPA Merger Committee believes that they have any meaningful purpose. Apparently, they missed APA's filings with the NMB a few weeks ago seeking a single carrier declaration. TheEye’s legal consultants believe that the NMB could rule as soon as March on the single carrier question. At that point USAPA and any other challengers will have thirty days to submit cards to force an election. At the end of thirty days (sometime in April) the APA will be the bargaining agent for all US Airways and American Airlines pilots.

We know this is contrary to what the USAPA leadership has been telling you, but rest assured, they are wrong. We had to laugh when we heard Steve Bradford telling pilots in the crew room that he believes there will be an election as many APA pilots are dissatisfied with their union.

Amazing Steve - did you not read Silver’s Order where she gave the keys to the seniority integration to the APA?

The end of USAPA is almost upon us. Once they are gone, the APA will be responsible for establishing a fair process to integrate the East, West, and American lists.

USAPA - you’ve been outmaneuvered.
morecowbell is offline  
Old 02-01-2014, 05:52 PM
  #2  
Cactus Aviator
 
JetMonkey's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Learning to fly with my left hand.
Posts: 250
Default

An election, huh? Hmm, let's see…

usapa dues: 2.45%
APA dues: 1.0%

Yeah, that's gonna be a tough choice..
JetMonkey is offline  
Old 02-01-2014, 07:46 PM
  #3  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

So the East says that the MOU neutered the West's Nic ambitions and the West says the MOU neutered USAPA's participation in the SLI ?

Man, it's tough to be a cat at US Airways.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 02-01-2014, 08:29 PM
  #4  
Flies With The Hat On
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Right of the Left Seat
Posts: 1,339
Default

Originally Posted by morecowbell View Post
Another take on the state of the East dominate union, USAPA>

USAPAWATCH: "Outmaneuvered"
USAPAWATCH.COM published a new post entitled "Outmaneuvered" on 2/1/2014 2:40:18 PM, written by TheEye.
Outmaneuvered

It has been a while since TheEye has blogged, but we couldn’t resist commenting on the denouement of the USAPA saga.

We encourage all US Airways and American pilots to read Judge Silver’s final Order. Contrary to what Hummel and the BPR is spouting off to the east membership, it's clear that Judge Silver completely neutered USAPA. Her ruling effectively ended USAPA’s participation in the upcoming seniority list integration with American. If this reality hasn’t sunk in yet, we suggest you actually read Judge Silver’s Order. You will read that USAPA waived their right to participate in the McCaskill-Bond process with the ratification of the MOU which requires the Allied Pilots Association (APA) to file for single carrier status within four months of the merger.

Silver stated :

“As contemplated by the MOU, in the very near future an election will take place and a new representative will be chosen by all the post-merger pilots. It is almost certain USAPA will lose that election. Once that happens, USAPA will no longer be entitled to participate in the seniority integration.”

With this in mind, it's laughable that the USAPA Merger Committee believes that they have any meaningful purpose. Apparently, they missed APA's filings with the NMB a few weeks ago seeking a single carrier declaration. TheEye’s legal consultants believe that the NMB could rule as soon as March on the single carrier question. At that point USAPA and any other challengers will have thirty days to submit cards to force an election. At the end of thirty days (sometime in April) the APA will be the bargaining agent for all US Airways and American Airlines pilots.

We know this is contrary to what the USAPA leadership has been telling you, but rest assured, they are wrong. We had to laugh when we heard Steve Bradford telling pilots in the crew room that he believes there will be an election as many APA pilots are dissatisfied with their union.

Amazing Steve - did you not read Silver’s Order where she gave the keys to the seniority integration to the APA?

The end of USAPA is almost upon us. Once they are gone, the APA will be responsible for establishing a fair process to integrate the East, West, and American lists.

USAPA - you’ve been outmaneuvered.
morecowbell—great handle, but why create a redundant thread when this has already been discussed?

Silver has no jurisdiction over if and when USAPA dissolves. She is just making an observation. The Merger Protocol Agreement is being negotiated as we speak and for all we know they'll enact a clause that guarantees the USAPA Merger Committee role going forward. MCB will also preserve the USAPA Merger Committee.
flybywire44 is offline  
Old 02-01-2014, 08:56 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,293
Default

USAPA WATCH has a worse record of predictions than cacti or WD.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 02-04-2014, 05:51 PM
  #6  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 52
Default

East Pilots - Amazing how they can still go out in public, such a shameful bunch. No integrity at all. Much like 6 year olds that didn't like the game and had to cheat.

Time to see which group has more Integrity: The American Pilots (APA), or the East Pilots(USAPA).

Who knows, maybe they will get along just fine. American Pilots showed no shame screwing the TWA pilots, and the East Pilots show no shame not committing to a "binding arbitration". Fun times ahead.
__________________________________________________ _________
From the nicisthenic web site:


February 4, 2014

Fellow West Pilots:

On Saturday, the four East pilots on the USAPA Merger Committee posted a Merger Committee Update announcing what we had already announced – that we had resigned from the USAPA Merger Committee. That part of their Update was accurate. But that was the only part. The purpose of this letter is to correct the flat inaccuracies and to fill in the gaps of information in that Update. The quotes below come directly from the Update, followed by the truth.


• “While this Committee has always had differences regarding the equity and fairness of the unmodified Nicolau award, the West members have always told us they would consider other methods of integration once the courts ruled. They gave that assurance at the time they were appointed to the Committee and reaffirmed that commitment after their appointments.”


WRONG – When we were interviewed by the BPR for positions on the Merger Committee, we made clear in no uncertain terms that our role – and our only role – was to see to it that the Nicolau Award was the basis for any seniority integration with any other airline. When members of the BPR repeatedly quizzed us on this point, Pat Szymanski – one of USAPA’s lawyers – piped in and told the BPR that our position was perfectly clear and that the BPR should either appoint us or not, but that trying to change our minds through their interrogation was a waste of time. He was right. Our position on the Nicolau Award was clear from the start and never wavered.
• “We have, of course, considered the unmodified Nicolau list and our thorough review clearly demonstrates that it doesn’t satisfy the fair and equitable requirements of McCaskill-Bond, nor is it fair for our pilot group as a whole.”


WRONG – We have seen no analysis presented to, or produced by, the Committee demonstrating that the list produced by the Nicolau Award is not a fair and equitable basis for integrating the US Airways pilots with the American pilots. It was developed under a “fair and equitable” standard by the most respected seniority integration arbitrator in the country for the reasons and under the circumstances that were fully and accurately laid out in his Opinion. No one – no court, arbitrator or serious commentator, other than the East pilots - has said it is not a fair and equitable list. And by the way, as we hardly need tell you, since the Nicolau list was created, West pilots have not enjoyed its benefits and East pilots – who were on the brink of losing their jobs entirely before the merger with America West – have moved happily up the promotion ladder while West pilots have suffered furloughs and displacements. Dave Odell – who was a West first officer when list was issued – was furloughed for a period and is now back flying as an A-320 first officer. And East pilots who were below Dave and were on furlough when the list was issued and had no prospects of ever flying for US Airways again before the merger – are now flying as Captains.


• “During the meeting, the East members repeatedly offered to have [the two of us] review and consider a series of potential SLI methods.”


This is a correct, but a telling statement. We have been on the Merger Committee for eight months. At no point at any meeting that we were at did the Committee develop any integration scenarios; we never even discussed any. But obviously someone had; quite plainly the four East members of the Committee, apparently behind our backs, have developed a “series of potential SLI methods.” If we were supposed to be working collaboratively, how did it come to be that by January 29 there were a “series of potential SLI methods” already developed that we had never heard about?


• “The West members offered as a solution, that they be assigned to a West-only committee to advocate for the unmodified Nicolau award. The East members do not have the ability to approve or disapprove that request, but we told them we would present that request to the BPR. The next morning, before we had the chance to present this request to the BPR, they abruptly resigned via email in a letter that contained numerous inaccuracies.”


We did tell the four East members of the Merger Committee that, if the Committee itself was not going to use the Nicolau Award as a basis for the integration with American, the only fair way to proceed was to create a procedural framework under the Protocol Agreement it was negotiating with APA and the Company that provided for three Merger Committees – an American Committee, an East Committee and a West Committee – thereby allowing the West pilots to advance the Nicolau Award as a basis for integration with the American pilots. That process would put to rest, once and for all, claims that the Nicolau Award was not a fair basis on which to integrate the US Airways list with the American list. If it wasn’t fair, the arbitrators in that case would say so by not using it. The four East Members of the Merger Committee did tell us that they did not have the power to do that (although we do not know why they didn’t have that power – they have been developing and negotiating all other terms of the Protocol Agreement) and would present it to the BPR. But, to quote them “before [they] had the chance to present this request to the BPR” they submitted a proposed Protocol Agreement to APA – over our stated objection – that called for only two Merger Committees – a USAPA Merger Committee and an APA Merger Committee. What is more, they rejected our extremely modest request to put into their proposed Protocol Agreement a provision that would have required the identification of a pilot who was on the Nicolau list and where he would be on that list in the collection and exchange of data with APA. When they sent that proposed Protocol Agreement to APA over our objection, we felt we had no option other than to resign from a Committee that, from the start, had no intention at all in representing the West pilots’ interests.



Perhaps the East pilots on the Merger Committee will present our three-committee proposal to the BPR and perhaps the BPR will adopt it and offer it to APA (who, by their proposed draft seem to have endorsed at least the idea of such an approach). If it does and if APA and the Company accept it, there will be no need for us to serve on the East Merger Committee – the West will have its own Committee. If it does not, we have no interest in serving on a USAPA Merger Committee that will not consider the West pilots’ legitimate interest in having the Nicolau Award at least considered in the upcoming seniority integration process. The point is that either way the BPR decides to go on this point, our usefulness on the Merger Committee, to whatever extent it might have ever been useful, was over.

The BPR has solicited other volunteers from among the West pilot group. Of course, every pilot has to decide for him or herself whether to accept that invitation. But before anyone does consider it, we urge you to read this letter again carefully and think about whether – in light of our experience – you truly feel that the USAPA Merger Committee is headed in a direction that you can endorse.
morecowbell is offline  
Old 02-04-2014, 08:07 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,293
Default

I guess this is what happens when you go all in with a bad hand. You have to ride it to the end and pray for a miracle. I believe Stravers was a big supporter of the protest filed over the Nic last summer, wasn't he? Maybe the westies were putting some heat on him for getting this submitted into evidence:

"101. In August, 2013, in response to Section 22.C protests filed by Phoenix based pilots , US Airways stated as follows:
This will acknowledge receipt of the letter of protest you filed
pursuant to Section 22.C of the America West Pilots' Collective
Bargaining Agreement concerning the July 1, 2013 seniority list
posted by the Company. In that protest, you contend that the
Company is obligated to implement the Nicolau Award as soon as the
MTA/MOU becomes effective. That contention is meritless, and your
protest must be denied.
Section 22.C of the America West Pilots' Collective Bargaining
Agreement only applies to disputes regarding a West Pilot's seniority
relative to other West Pilots as set forth on the West Pilots seniority
list. Challenges to the East/West integrated seniority list, which will
be created after there has been a merger and the federally-required
McCaskill-Bond seniority integration process has been completed, are
beyond the scope of Section 22.C.
Moreover, even if the Section 22.C process applied to disputes
regarding the future East/West integrated seniority list, your claimthat the MTA/MOU amounts to a single labor agreement obligating the Company to apply the Nicolau Award immediately is contrary to the express provision in the Transition Agreement (Section XII.B)
that any of the Transition Agreement's provisions "[m]ay be modified
by written agreement of the Association and the Airline Parties
collectively."
By its terms, the MOU constitutes a written agreement between
USAPA and the Company which modifies the provisions of the
Transition Agreement relating to implementation of an integrated
seniority list. Paragraph 10.h. of the MOU specifies that "US Airways
agrees that neither this Memorandum nor the JCBA shall provide a
basis for changing the seniority list currently in effect at US Airways
other than through the process set forth in this Paragraph 10." The
Paragraph 10 process provides for seniority-list integration in
accordance with the standards and procedures of the federal
McCaskill-Bond law, and that process will not even begin until after
the merger has been consummated. Modifying the seniority lists
immediately, as you have requested, would violate the MTA/MOU."

AA guys, this was a response from US management.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 02-04-2014, 10:46 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: B777/CA retired
Posts: 1,481
Default

Sounds wonderful until you remember that the Nicolau is the only list accepted by US Airways management. Not DOH, or DOH with conditions and restrictions, or ordered by height or last name or any combination of the above. The Nicolau still exists, it did not get swept away. It is still to be determined if it will be in play.

You reference a grievance filed by west pilots and ruled on by East managers and not taken to arbitration. Notice please that those managers will be gone. And also notice that USAPA controls how the grievances are processed. We have been ill served by USAPA on every grievance we have filed. Of course the east has as well which begs the question as to why the east has put up with USAPA since they have never done anything except stall a contract. Highest union dues in the business for the least amount of effectiveness. Yep, that's the mentality there.

I do not say that the Nicolau will be used. I don't make predictions since none of us know how this will play out. Silver did not give any clarity to either side except to put the burden back on the company and the final CBA to ensure the process was followed properly. Lots of precedents being set with this merger, since it is so f'ed up going into it.
cactusmike is offline  
Old 02-05-2014, 04:23 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,293
Default

Originally Posted by cactusmike View Post
Sounds wonderful until you remember that the Nicolau is the only list accepted by US Airways management. Not DOH, or DOH with conditions and restrictions, or ordered by height or last name or any combination of the above. The Nicolau still exists, it did not get swept away. It is still to be determined if it will be in play.

You reference a grievance filed by west pilots and ruled on by East managers and not taken to arbitration. Notice please that those managers will be gone. And also notice that USAPA controls how the grievances are processed. We have been ill served by USAPA on every grievance we have filed. Of course the east has as well which begs the question as to why the east has put up with USAPA since they have never done anything except stall a contract. Highest union dues in the business for the least amount of effectiveness. Yep, that's the mentality there.

I do not say that the Nicolau will be used. I don't make predictions since none of us know how this will play out. Silver did not give any clarity to either side except to put the burden back on the company and the final CBA to ensure the process was followed properly. Lots of precedents being set with this merger, since it is so f'ed up going into it.
My 1998 contract was accepted by the company. Can I pick what I want to from it? No, it was modified by LOA 93 and then the MOU. Captain Hogg is our boss for now, US Airways management and he told you how it works. Judge Silver told you, but you hang on to AOL catchphrases.

I'm not making predictions either. The Nic has proven hard to kill. Just pointing out what I see as flawed logic.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 02-05-2014, 05:01 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 405
Default

Originally Posted by cactusmike View Post

You reference a grievance filed by west pilots and ruled on by East managers and not taken to arbitration. Notice please that those managers will be gone. And also notice that USAPA controls how the grievances are processed. We have been ill served by USAPA on every grievance we have filed.
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 - ok

Notice please it was a letter of protest not a grievance.

Furthermore, it was written by the PHX Chief Pilot ( a West pilot ) who has already been announced to remain to be the New American Director PHX.

Last edited by FreighterGuyNow; 02-05-2014 at 05:07 AM. Reason: verbage
FreighterGuyNow is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cactiboss
American
35
09-03-2013 06:27 AM
coryk
Regional
15
08-24-2013 03:01 AM
pilotgolfer
Major
11
09-11-2012 05:04 AM
jungle
Money Talk
14
05-18-2012 05:28 AM
cactiboss
Major
87
10-03-2008 02:24 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices