![]() |
Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
(Post 1586122)
America West pilots talking about salary. That is funny. :cool:
http://web.mit.edu/airlinedata/www/D...20Copilots.pdf But either way I think we'll gain more with getting this SLI done and looking at the big picture of a industry leading JCBA. |
Originally Posted by Smoke Toliet
(Post 1586091)
Embarrassing is USAPA and 8+ years of LOA 93.
Very few guys on the East look like they are starving bro and even though the pay was low for pilots, in the big picture, it wasn't food stamps. Kinda funny, the West complained about our (East) pay rates, and now we have a 3rd lister is complaining about our previous pay rates. |
Originally Posted by Smoke Toliet
(Post 1586091)
Embarrassing is USAPA and 8+ years of LOA 93.
I don't regret a single extra minute spent on LOA 93. I spent 9 years. How many did you, scooter? |
Originally Posted by DCA A321 FO
(Post 1586142)
Very few guys on the East look like they are starving bro and even though the pay was low for pilots, in the big picture, it wasn't food stamps.
Kinda funny, the West complained about our (East) pay rates, and now we have a 3rd lister is complaining about our previous pay rates. "Third lister" was a concept that existed under the 2005 TA. Technically there is no longer a "third list" where all USAir pilots hired after the 2005 TA were guaranteed to be junior to USAir pilots hired before the 2005 TA. The concept of a third list is not only a legal nullity now, it is also unfair from a perspective of LOS and relative position. :D |
Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
(Post 1586223)
"Third lister" was a concept that existed under the 2005 TA. Technically there is no longer a "third list" where all USAir pilots hired after the 2005 TA were guaranteed to be junior to USAir pilots hired before the 2005 TA. The concept of a third list is not only a legal nullity now, it is also unfair from a perspective of LOS and relative position. :D
|
Originally Posted by DCA A321 FO
(Post 1586226)
I used his terminology. Nice .pdf regarding pay btw :-)
I like the "third lister" term and enjoy arguing why they should be senior to some west pilots that were hired before them. It was fair for the West to argue, and more importantly, it was some of those West pilots that fought to keep the third listers on lower pay for the same work! :D |
You guys are so damn funny. I'm glad you enjoyed the RJ wages sitting in the right seat for 20 years. You had about two good years of a contract before you went CH 11 twice. Now you union is going away and you say that it doesn't matter. Too damn funny.
Purple Turd, we did not lose in Judge Wake's court. We lost on ripeness on appeal and Judge Silver basically told USAPA to go pound sand. While it is true that we have not won the DFR claim we have not lost either as our list is still very much in play and USAPA will be tossed on the street. Considering we have the winning SLI attorney in several arbitrations on our side I'd have to say that you guys are in for a severe reality check quite soon. The APA already gave you your first wake up call today. Enjoy! |
Originally Posted by cactusmike
(Post 1586367)
You guys are so damn funny. I'm glad you enjoyed the RJ wages sitting in the right seat for 20 years. You had about two good years of a contract before you went CH 11 twice. Now you union is going away and you say that it doesn't matter. Too damn funny.
Purple Turd, we did not lose in Judge Wake's court. We lost on ripeness on appeal and Judge Silver basically told USAPA to go pound sand. While it is true that we have not won the DFR claim we have not lost either as our list is still very much in play and USAPA will be tossed on the street. Considering we have the winning SLI attorney in several arbitrations on our side I'd have to say that you guys are in for a severe reality check quite soon. The APA already gave you your first wake up call today. Enjoy! |
Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
(Post 1586368)
I have another fan! :cool:
|
Originally Posted by DCA A321 FO
(Post 1586381)
Well I guess the MIT table was too complicated for him. He still luvs u.
Hmmm, work for a stagnating company that was going to liquidate or work for a growing company that is upgrading quickly and is profitable. I'll take AWA, thanks. And though we have been the ones stagnating over the past 8 years I will still take working with a unified, professional group like we have here over the alternative. We take care of each other and we support one another. We have proven that over and over. |
Originally Posted by cactusmike
(Post 1586389)
...And though we have been the ones stagnating over the past 8 years ...
Stagnation or reduction? You tell me my friend. |
Originally Posted by DCA A321 FO
(Post 1586396)
Well I submit to you that without the East over these years you would be out of business.
Stagnation or reduction? You tell me my friend. Also, without the US Airways merger we would have been available to merge with anyone else, which would have been vastly preferable. |
Originally Posted by cactusmike
(Post 1586406)
No, we would have been fine with our lower costs absent the merger. We had competed quite well with SWA for all those years. The only time we really lost money was the 747 program and that's what put us into ch11. We made money during the CH11 process and after until 9/11. Then we made money again.
Also, without the US Airways merger we would have been available to merge with anyone else, which would have been vastly preferable. Just talking ****, but you act like the East has hurt you so much, and you are entitled to come fly A330 and 767 to Europe, thats Bull****. |
Originally Posted by cactusmike
(Post 1586406)
Then we made money again.
Also, without the US Airways merger we would have been available to merge with anyone else, which would have been vastly preferable. Nobody else wanted you! The US/AW merger was a home run for the companies. It could have been for us too if not for the Nic. |
Originally Posted by cactusmike
(Post 1586406)
We made money during the CH11 process and after until 9/11. Then we made money again.
US pulled down $900 million AA? "0" |
Originally Posted by Dolphinflyer
(Post 1587357)
Just ignore the $400+ million ATSB government loan to stay afloat in 2002
US pulled down $900 million AA? "0" They were loans and paid in full with the money raised for the US/AW. At a orodit if over $100to million to the federal government. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:50 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands