Eagle Votes No
#2
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Might as well make them E-190's. Only 20 on property on the U side of AA and that seems like way too small a fleet to maintain and staff, so they should either add more or better yet, replace them with more A319's.
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 1,114
Let's get them as 190s and put them in DFW/MIA/LAX and let APA enjoy their awesome group one pay they negotiated.
#4
The 175's will be RFP'd immediately, so sayeth management. They'll never go to mainline. Even if the 190 "B" scale is cheap, its not as cheap as Repbulic, Mesa, PSA, Skywest, or any other regional.
Thank you to the Eagle folks for standing up for yourselves, and trying to make this a better career for everyone. Glad to see one pilot group who has integrity.
Thank you to the Eagle folks for standing up for yourselves, and trying to make this a better career for everyone. Glad to see one pilot group who has integrity.
#5
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Well, I can't argue with that, it blows. Of course as US Airways pilots should know, under bankruptcy you're pretty much helpless in the leverage department. Given the choice though of E-175's at AA regionals and E-190's at mainline, I'll take the latter. More bodies= more job security.
#6
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
The 175's will be RFP'd immediately, so sayeth management. They'll never go to mainline. Even if the 190 "B" scale is cheap, its not as cheap as Repbulic, Mesa, PSA, Skywest, or any other regional.
Thank you to the Eagle folks for standing up for yourselves, and trying to make this a better career for everyone. Glad to see one pilot group who has integrity.
Thank you to the Eagle folks for standing up for yourselves, and trying to make this a better career for everyone. Glad to see one pilot group who has integrity.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post