![]() |
Originally Posted by crzipilot
(Post 1727683)
It was ran as one entity with separate seniority lists, separate fleets, contracts, separate flight attendants. Maybe a few other things....
Funny, west pilots always seemed to be pleased that we were different until the MOU. |
Originally Posted by crzipilot
(Post 1727683)
It was ran as one entity
|
Originally Posted by cactiboss
(Post 1727701)
You can stop right there, one entity one management. That is the date arbitrators recognized on the UAL/CAL seniority award.
|
Originally Posted by R57 relay
(Post 1727702)
So you are going with a UA/CO style SLI? Have you talked to cactus one?
|
BTW cal/ual were done using ALPA merger policies, ours is going to be a free for all and the arbitrators will have a wide range of authority. I would guess relative position with fences on 330,350/777,787 for a period of 5 years
|
Originally Posted by cactiboss
(Post 1727720)
and the arbitrators will have a wide range of authority.
|
Originally Posted by algflyr
(Post 1727722)
Really? Not too sure about that...
|
Originally Posted by cactiboss
(Post 1727729)
Ours is being conducted under Allegheny-Mohawk LPP, only restrictions are in the MOU, no bump no flush etc.
|
Originally Posted by algflyr
(Post 1727731)
And of course the restrictions in the PA...
|
Did that UAL/CAL SLI give some consideration to LOS to furloughed guys? think I remember hearing something about that.
How is that in any form the same ideals as the NIC? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:57 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands