|
Originally Posted by Errbus
(Post 1726886)
Anyone think the 330 base will stay there or close? Seems like they could be much better used elsewhere with CLT just having 767s in the future.
|
Ugh. Of all the bases I can see myself moving to it's CLT, but my career ambitions involve widebody flying in the future, so sick of commuting.
|
Originally Posted by The Drizzle
(Post 1726916)
Ugh. Of all the bases I can see myself moving to it's CLT, but my career ambitions involve widebody flying in the future, so sick of commuting.
|
List of Metropolitan Statistical Areas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Looking at the largest MSAs and the correlation to airline hubs, CLT is most at risk to becoming irrelevant. |
Originally Posted by Overtemp
(Post 1726936)
List of Metropolitan Statistical Areas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Looking at the largest MSAs and the correlation to airline hubs, CLT is most at risk to becoming irrelevant. |
|
Originally Posted by Sliceback
(Post 1726849)
Agreed.
DFW shrinking before CLT? I doubt it. DFW is 300+ nm closer to Asia then CLT or PHL. Current thinking is to feed S.A. to Asia via DFW. For central and NE Asia DFW is the shortest route available from S.A. Large S.A. presence might allow AA to become the #1 S.A. to Asia feeder. $850 million trapped in Venezuela. SA routes underperforming the rest of the airline. |
Future of CLT
MIA cannot serve the southeast.
CLT will remain, but will be reduced somewhat. They're already referring to the new CLT international terminal as the new domestic terminal. |
Originally Posted by R57 relay
(Post 1726902)
The 767s will be gone soon. If the green book allows 5 day trips I could see closing the international base and flying any TA from CLT elsewhere. Say JFK-LHR-CLT-LHR-JFK.
|
Not to LHR I bet they don't.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:04 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands