APA Reps Speak Out About Company's JCBA Offer
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
"....some members of the board think that negotiations are over. In reality, they have only begun. Having dealt with this management for almost a decade, negotiations are over when the "final language" is written, management implements their interpretation of what was written, we grieve the issue...(pause as we wait for months and years for the grievance to be heard, rejected, reheard, rejected) and finally reach an arbitrator who sides with the company because the final language was vague or in some other way interpretable in any way but the way in which the pilots interpreted it. Only then do you have final language and a contract. Hundreds of grievances later, we know that this is the case. As you can see, we are a long way from completing negotiations with this management group..."
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Parker has been saying "No" to us since he was in diapers and we have given him everything he wants, year after year. Decade after decade.
He says no, and yet gets everything... Reconcile that.
#13
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
I totally agree.
It's definitely the smart play to vote NO, lose $1.8 bil in pay, and still not get min day.
Yep, only a dumbass would vote YES to make an additional $1.8 bil under the same circumstance.
We can always trade the $1/hr in compensation to get min day later on, and still be $15-$30/hr higher than we would be by voting no, not getting calendar day.
Did you no voters take math in college?
It's definitely the smart play to vote NO, lose $1.8 bil in pay, and still not get min day.
Yep, only a dumbass would vote YES to make an additional $1.8 bil under the same circumstance.
We can always trade the $1/hr in compensation to get min day later on, and still be $15-$30/hr higher than we would be by voting no, not getting calendar day.
Did you no voters take math in college?
This TA is filled to the BRIM with subtraction strategies to turn the pilots initial surplus into a staggering long-term deficit. Trade a measly $1/hour later for MCD ?
You've got to be high on meth !
In 2020, we will ALREADY be far and away the lowest pay rate pilots out there and Parker will laugh louder at us then than he is now.
You've simply GOT to be a management plant coming up with this utter nonsense.
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 143
Yes the pay raise is coming.
But, it will be exactly what I wrote about in the other thread.
Delta must get their new rate by July of this year in order to get anything above what is already published.
Barring that, we're making significantly more under the proposed JCBA then going to arbitration INCLDUING the pay parity. Roughly $1.8 bil more.
This isn't about sliding the pay scale forward one year, its value is much higher than that.
People don't realize that (such as yourself) and my fear is folks will be voting out of ignorance vs fact. That's why I brought my calculator.
But, it will be exactly what I wrote about in the other thread.
Delta must get their new rate by July of this year in order to get anything above what is already published.
Barring that, we're making significantly more under the proposed JCBA then going to arbitration INCLDUING the pay parity. Roughly $1.8 bil more.
This isn't about sliding the pay scale forward one year, its value is much higher than that.
People don't realize that (such as yourself) and my fear is folks will be voting out of ignorance vs fact. That's why I brought my calculator.
True, I don't realize just how many fanciful numbers you came up with on your calculator, but here's something you don't realize, I make plenty of money right now. More money is nice, but it's only marginally nice. I will make even more money with an industry-indexed increase less than 12 months from now while retaining the value of work rules which have not been conceded from the MTA. Thing is, Doug wants some of those work rules out of there and he has yet to offer enough in exchange.
That being said, your $1,800,000,000 is way off. I don't rely on Company valuations, especially when there are certain things that the Company values as 0. Such as employee goodwill... it can't be quantified so it is assigned a value of $0. But keep counting that loose change and tapping away on the calculator.
My fear is that folks (such as yourself) will be voting based on tapping a 3 digit number into a calculator then multiplying it by a two digit number. That's just silly.
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 143
If we say yes to Parker's asks he will have everything he asked for and we will have zero things we want for the cncessions we are selling. We will have nothing left that wants except SCOPE...
Parker has been saying "No" to us since he was in diapers and we have given him everything he wants, year after year. Decade after decade.
He says no, and yet gets everything... Reconcile that.
Parker has been saying "No" to us since he was in diapers and we have given him everything he wants, year after year. Decade after decade.
He says no, and yet gets everything... Reconcile that.
Since at least 2002 there is nothing that PSA has said 'No' too. They hired them there based on the in-abilty to say 'No', which is the same reason I guess so many now work here.
#17
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
#18
Line Holder
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 56
!
They're ill advised for thinking we will accept a sub-par contract! NO to concessions. We will see their executive compensation very soon. When we reject their sub-par offer, they WILL come back to APA and renegotiate. They are morons for thinking we will accept their concessionary contract. We only need to wait a few month for a pay raise.
#19
I believe that's an ex-PSA pilot(express, not the real PSA) your attempting to reason with.
Since at least 2002 there is nothing that PSA has said 'No' too. They hired them there based on the in-abilty to say 'No', which is the same reason I guess so many now work here.
Since at least 2002 there is nothing that PSA has said 'No' too. They hired them there based on the in-abilty to say 'No', which is the same reason I guess so many now work here.
#20
Line Holder
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 56
Parker Kirby and Glass set a timeline to accept their proposal or go to arbitration. They then extend the deadline after asking APA to extend for 30 days. Afterwards, they tell APA they won't address any of the pilots' concerns and must only address the company's wants. Then, they say the APA must agree to their demands by a certain date and then don't have the final language for their own demands on their own arbitrary fabricated deadline. Then they try and circumvent the union by sending a letter from Kirby to all pilots. I can wait for the pay raise in 2016. Priceless. Vote NO!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
suppakuppa
Flight Schools and Training
31
02-06-2018 04:17 PM