$8.1b $4b $2b = no caledar day
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
$8.1b $4b $2b = no caledar day
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ameri...120000482.html
Doug has:
$8B Cash
$4B profit
$2B stock buy back
___________________
but he refuses to pay $80M for industry standard Caledar Day?
Is that acceptable?
Yes or No? This isn't complicated. Yes or No?
Doug has:
$8B Cash
$4B profit
$2B stock buy back
___________________
but he refuses to pay $80M for industry standard Caledar Day?
Is that acceptable?
Yes or No? This isn't complicated. Yes or No?
#3
It doesn't matter if it is acceptable. You only get what you negotiate. We got shorted in the crafting of the MOU because APA was so engrossed in removing Horton. The question now is which vote yields more advantages to a majority of the group. Only 4 hours until we find out.
#4
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ameri...120000482.html
Doug has:
$8B Cash
$4B profit
$2B stock buy back
___________________
but he refuses to pay $80M for industry standard Caledar Day?
Is that acceptable?
Yes or No? This isn't complicated. Yes or No?
Doug has:
$8B Cash
$4B profit
$2B stock buy back
___________________
but he refuses to pay $80M for industry standard Caledar Day?
Is that acceptable?
Yes or No? This isn't complicated. Yes or No?
#5
If I was a management guy it doesn't surprise me one bit. Silver said it best. You only get what you negotiate. It's up to the guys/gals that are allowed to vote to strike the "NO" box which lets management know that it's not good enough. But with the big pay raise staring them in the face, some won't be seeing the forest before the trees.
I'm on the outside looking in and my "notice to cancel recall" is sitting in my "mail waiting to be sent box." Personally, if I was allowed a vote it would have been no. But that's beside the point as I've taken all emotion out of it and it's out of my hands. Just like the SLI will be. I'll go to work, fill my coffers, and still hopefully, be able to punch out at age sixty as I'm sitting here in my mid forties.
And for off the street hiring candidates, who knows how this may mess things up. Sure, they're still going to have classes but with 800+ folks watching this vote in the stands I'm sure they're going to be able to fill some classes with the folks like myself.
Tick tock goes the clock . . . .
I'm on the outside looking in and my "notice to cancel recall" is sitting in my "mail waiting to be sent box." Personally, if I was allowed a vote it would have been no. But that's beside the point as I've taken all emotion out of it and it's out of my hands. Just like the SLI will be. I'll go to work, fill my coffers, and still hopefully, be able to punch out at age sixty as I'm sitting here in my mid forties.
And for off the street hiring candidates, who knows how this may mess things up. Sure, they're still going to have classes but with 800+ folks watching this vote in the stands I'm sure they're going to be able to fill some classes with the folks like myself.
Tick tock goes the clock . . . .
#6
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
It doesn't matter if it is acceptable. You only get what you negotiate. We got shorted in the crafting of the MOU because APA was so engrossed in removing Horton. The question now is which vote yields more advantages to a majority of the group. Only 4 hours until we find out.
One is short-sighted and stupid and the other requires determination and courage. Soon, we WILL find out what the majority prefer and if it's the former, in 2020, the majority then will have no choice but to do it again. Many of the "no's" of today will be the "yes's" of 2020, the only question is what we will sell then for Delta pay.
I'll be open to just about anything.
#7
It's totally unaceptable just as profit sharing, full LOS for all furloughes, a standard uniform allowance, the list goes on... BUT, if voting no would make a difference, then that what mine and many like me would click.
The whole take a stand, and that'll show management doesn't cut it with ParKirby... they have absolutely NO problem living with a divided, let's show them, ****ed-off angry pilot group. They've already have and profited nicely from it. Better to wait for section 6 when we're ALL united. They'll drag it out like always so might as well keep more $$$ while we wait.
The whole take a stand, and that'll show management doesn't cut it with ParKirby... they have absolutely NO problem living with a divided, let's show them, ****ed-off angry pilot group. They've already have and profited nicely from it. Better to wait for section 6 when we're ALL united. They'll drag it out like always so might as well keep more $$$ while we wait.
#8
AAG may well end up being largest operator of the E195, with those discounted rates cemented in place for what, two contract cycles?
Y'all be sure and thank the LAX and ORD bedwetters for siding with management and polishing this turd to a blinding sheen and garnishing it with a Pontius Pilate move by the "President".
Not the APA I remember.
Good times ahead kids, enjoy.
#9
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
It's totally unaceptable just as profit sharing, full LOS for all furloughes, a standard uniform allowance, the list goes on... BUT, if voting no would make a difference, then that what mine and many like me would click.
The whole take a stand, and that'll show management doesn't cut it with ParKirby... they have absolutely NO problem living with a divided, let's show them, ****ed-off angry pilot group. They've already have and profited nicely from it. Better to wait for section 6 when we're ALL united. They'll drag it out like always so might as well keep more $$$ while we wait.
The whole take a stand, and that'll show management doesn't cut it with ParKirby... they have absolutely NO problem living with a divided, let's show them, ****ed-off angry pilot group. They've already have and profited nicely from it. Better to wait for section 6 when we're ALL united. They'll drag it out like always so might as well keep more $$$ while we wait.
You get what I'm telling you, yes ?
I hope you're 55+ in 2020 looking on that as your exit contract, because if you ARE NOT in that majority, you're ****ed........again.
That's going to be an especially long and painful addition to your parole. See you in 2020.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post