Why We Need To Be Talking About ALPA
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 321
"The same old ALPA mistakes." Like it or not ALPA provides the best contracts in the world. Talk to pilots working for Norwegian, RyanAir, Emirates, Etihad, EasyJet, Qatar, anywhere in China, etc and you might change your tune.
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,238
So all those Airlines are ALPA? I didn't know that!
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,238
ALPA alone will not change the AA pilot equation. That equation was solidified in the last interaction with Parker. It's an equation of leverage and ALPA's mere presence alone won't alter that. Either AA pilots gain the ability for legal self-help (virtually impossible) or a significant number of AA pilots and ALPA national accept risk and place themselves in jeopardy which is almost as impossible. That is the ONLY way any recapture of what has been given way will occur without equal payment in other areas. Even if ALPA were on the property for the 2019 openers, it will be 5 years before any resolution to contractual negotiations occurs unless Parker wants it sooner and the only way that will happen is we once again agree to pay for some gains at the expense of others, AKA "cost neutral".
Votng in ALPA is fine, but it's misguided to think it will result in anything until at least 2024 and even then it will require significant risk both among AA pilots and ALPA. Parker will control the show and that is because we ensured he will with our last demonstration of our ability to be manipulated and our willingness to be bought off for pennies on the dollar.
Votng in ALPA is fine, but it's misguided to think it will result in anything until at least 2024 and even then it will require significant risk both among AA pilots and ALPA. Parker will control the show and that is because we ensured he will with our last demonstration of our ability to be manipulated and our willingness to be bought off for pennies on the dollar.
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 321
#46
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
ExpressJet and air Wisconsin have good contracts and they are ALPA also. ALPA is there to leverage any positive economics (profits) on the property and they are there to mitigate negative economic forces (bankruptcies, hostile management, no profits, etc). The best thing for pilots ability to gain good contracts is working for profitable airlines. The question is, can your union extract (or mitigate) as much as possible? If you are in bankruptcy, you can still have wins by minimizing losses. And when you are profitable, you measure success on how good you were able to negotiate. So if you look at PSA, pdt, envoy, you'll see what your management will do with a divided pilot group. TSA as well, as their management divided them and now whipsaws three of their airlines against each pilot group, one of which isn't an ALPA pilot group.
#47
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,889
ALPA has had its share of bad presidents and made some ugly moves.
But the long term pay and benefits that legacy carrier pilots enjoy under ALPA membership are obvious. They have consistently outdone us just about every contract cycle. And it's high time that AA pilots, the largest group in the world, took advantage of that fact.
If we just focus on the individual mistakes ALPA and its presidents have made, of course it looks grim. But if we instead focus on the big picture and the potential we'd have under ALPA membership, the answer is obvious: we need to switch.
I'll also add: Regional airline ALPA and legacy ALPA are two completely different animals. ALPA can never represent the regionals as well as it can the legacies simply due to the two entirely different career prospects of each. ALPA recognizes that the regionals are the pathway to the legacies, and as such, they dedicate the majority of their energy on making the legacies a better career. By doing that, they are actually succeeding at putting pressure on the regionals to either up their game or go under. Case in point, Republic. What the regionals need are a regional ALPA type of union, a branch of ALPA that only represents them. Which is kind of what they have already.
That is why very few regional pilots have anything good to say about ALPA, whereas the majority of legacy pilots praise what ALPA has gotten them over the years. It sounds convoluted but it's the way it works.
And lastly, many folks bring up, What has ALPA done for the legacies during their BKs, where their lay and work rules were gutted? Ahem. ANY airline that goes through financial difficulties up to BK, will get spanked no matter WHO represents them. However, ask yourselves, who are the legacy airline pilots groups that exited BK and bad times with the most lucrative contracts? Hint: it ain't the APA group.
ALPA all the way, it's time.
But the long term pay and benefits that legacy carrier pilots enjoy under ALPA membership are obvious. They have consistently outdone us just about every contract cycle. And it's high time that AA pilots, the largest group in the world, took advantage of that fact.
If we just focus on the individual mistakes ALPA and its presidents have made, of course it looks grim. But if we instead focus on the big picture and the potential we'd have under ALPA membership, the answer is obvious: we need to switch.
I'll also add: Regional airline ALPA and legacy ALPA are two completely different animals. ALPA can never represent the regionals as well as it can the legacies simply due to the two entirely different career prospects of each. ALPA recognizes that the regionals are the pathway to the legacies, and as such, they dedicate the majority of their energy on making the legacies a better career. By doing that, they are actually succeeding at putting pressure on the regionals to either up their game or go under. Case in point, Republic. What the regionals need are a regional ALPA type of union, a branch of ALPA that only represents them. Which is kind of what they have already.
That is why very few regional pilots have anything good to say about ALPA, whereas the majority of legacy pilots praise what ALPA has gotten them over the years. It sounds convoluted but it's the way it works.
And lastly, many folks bring up, What has ALPA done for the legacies during their BKs, where their lay and work rules were gutted? Ahem. ANY airline that goes through financial difficulties up to BK, will get spanked no matter WHO represents them. However, ask yourselves, who are the legacy airline pilots groups that exited BK and bad times with the most lucrative contracts? Hint: it ain't the APA group.
ALPA all the way, it's time.
#48
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 321
seafye,
If you can't figure out the difference between regional alpa and mainline alpa it's not even worth arguing the point. Hint: mainline contracts have scope clauses yet a regional airline can be shut down and replaced the moment their contracts become too expensive (think Comair).
Yes you must be right. PDT pay sucks so ALPA must be bad. I'm sure if DAL, UAL, UPS, SWA, AA, etc went non union then they would all get raises and better work rules. It's those corrupt union thugs that are holding down the working pilot.
If you can't figure out the difference between regional alpa and mainline alpa it's not even worth arguing the point. Hint: mainline contracts have scope clauses yet a regional airline can be shut down and replaced the moment their contracts become too expensive (think Comair).
Yes you must be right. PDT pay sucks so ALPA must be bad. I'm sure if DAL, UAL, UPS, SWA, AA, etc went non union then they would all get raises and better work rules. It's those corrupt union thugs that are holding down the working pilot.
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,205
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 321
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post