Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
190 fleet being phased out >

190 fleet being phased out

Search
Notices

190 fleet being phased out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-2016, 03:36 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,238
Default

Originally Posted by Rivit View Post
Where are all of the company cheerleaders?
Now practically everything will be at group II Pay rates...
Going for great. No, we will never be anything close to that.
PMA? Great attitude. Look in the mirror, that chip on your shoulder is getting bigger.
Route66 is offline  
Old 05-14-2016, 06:00 AM
  #22  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Arado 234 View Post
Could it be a strategy to get a better deal from Embraer (190E2) or Bombardier (CS100/300)? Management is really inconsistent with their statements, one day XXX is great, the following day XXX is the worst thing ever.
Could be, but they are stating future new-hires can expect to all go to group II. If they did decide to commit to another GI like the E-195 or CS 100, they'd have to order at least 75-100. I kinda take them at their claim of using A319's and E175's to compete with the competitions GI/II aircraft. It's a risky move IMO though as the regionals contract, eventually even the E175 will fail to lure in pilots and the flow already doesn't sound like a future carrot it's hoped to be. In a few years (when these types of problems are becoming more evident), many pilots will have the choice of going directly to Delta or United flying group I type aircraft with a mainline seniority number that starts working for them on day 1 or AA's wholly-owned regionals where the fly similar aircraft (E175), but only the promise of seniority years down the road, since supposedly most of the AA mainline slots go through the flow via Eagle.

If and when it comes down to many new pilots having a choice of either going right to the majors or LCC's vs. AA's "farm team", AA will be in trouble.........er, actually more trouble. They'll have to figure out something new to staff hundreds upon hundreds of large RJ's no one wants to fly unless they have to which is happening ALREADY. Delta/United CS-series/E-195, LCC's Boeing/Airbus or Eagle's E175 with a promise to flow and get AA seniority in 5 years ?

AA's will get another bronze medal when that situation develops, but so far bronze is apparently the "new" AA's forte by all appearances.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 05-14-2016, 06:56 AM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 58
Default

I would agree that getting rid of the E190s would be a good thing if they were adding 20 A319s to replace them. That's not the case, though. All of our narrow body Airbus orders are 321s which means the E190 routes will go to Republic, Mesa, Envoy, etc. if there are a few that go to an A319, then it just means that plane is being pulled off something else
kevin_p is offline  
Old 05-14-2016, 07:00 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
OKLATEX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: B767 FO
Posts: 421
Default

Originally Posted by Saabs View Post
Gotcha. Thanks for doing that. I bet with 757 and 320s being parked we are much much smaller than that.
Just curious, what is the retirement plan for the 757s?
OKLATEX is offline  
Old 05-14-2016, 07:31 AM
  #25  
Child of the Magenta
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Position: 737
Posts: 387
Default

I'm not sure about the 190 flying going to regionals. The situation hasn't reached the tipping point yet and we are already getting back flying from the regionals in ORD. There are PIT, MCI, DTW (among other) legs on the 737 and that's not something we've had for a long time. If the regionals can't staff the flying now, how will they when the hiring REALLY starts?
LuckyNow is offline  
Old 05-14-2016, 08:21 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Arado 234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,764
Default

Originally Posted by kevin_p View Post
I would agree that getting rid of the E190s would be a good thing if they were adding 20 A319s to replace them. That's not the case, though. All of our narrow body Airbus orders are 321s which means the E190 routes will go to Republic, Mesa, Envoy, etc. if there are a few that go to an A319, then it just means that plane is being pulled off something else
* Really * dumb ignorant etc question, but what's the scope clause say? Can we give E190, CS100 flying to the regionals?
Arado 234 is offline  
Old 05-14-2016, 08:29 AM
  #27  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by LuckyNow View Post
I'm not sure about the 190 flying going to regionals. The situation hasn't reached the tipping point yet and we are already getting back flying from the regionals in ORD. There are PIT, MCI, DTW (among other) legs on the 737 and that's not something we've had for a long time. If the regionals can't staff the flying now, how will they when the hiring REALLY starts?
For AAG, it will most likely be kick the can by burning the furniture to heat the house, as usual. As their regional pilot staffing ranks evaporate, they'll just continue to park smaller RJ's until ultimately they're only left with 76-seaters maxed out under present scope. That will take several years, but considering the present view looking forward at some point they will get to that benchmark. At that point, their "come to Jesus" moment will arrive and they'll either have to concede market share or come up with a new paradigm to cover that flying, be it mainline or seeking (and paying for) scope relief.

I expect them to fumble the ball by remaining in their reactive mindset instead of being proactive. It's what bronze medalists in a three way race tend to do.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 05-14-2016, 09:24 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,091
Default

I don't think you guys are giving management enough credit. I personally feel they know exactly where they stand and what is coming. You may disagree with their management tactic for dealing with the issue, but saying Parker & CO don't understand what they are doing is disingenuous.
Name User is offline  
Old 05-14-2016, 10:20 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,191
Default

319 replaces E190. 737 replaces 319. 321 replaces 737.

The company can add 319's or change gauge as necessary to replace the 190's.
Sliceback is offline  
Old 05-14-2016, 10:20 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
billyho's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,450
Default

Originally Posted by Name User View Post
I don't think you guys are giving management enough credit. I personally feel they know exactly where they stand and what is coming. You may disagree with their management tactic for dealing with the issue, but saying Parker & CO don't understand what they are doing is disingenuous.

Yep, just look at what Sam Walton did for Walmart.
billyho is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CanoePilot
American
27
05-22-2014 06:10 AM
KnightFlyer
Cargo
95
04-01-2014 07:39 PM
Diesel 10
Cargo
0
10-05-2005 06:19 PM
Sr. Barco
Major
0
07-23-2005 01:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices